Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc., 330 N.W.2d 428.

385 citing documents.

Bilal v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 537 N.W.2d 614 Minn. 1995
To prove a claim of disparate treatment, “ ‘proof of discriminatory motive is critical, although it can in some situations be inferred from the mere fact of differences in treatment.’ ” , 441 n. 12 (Minn.1983) (quoting Int’l Bhd.
Dietrich v. Canadian Pacific Ltd. 536 N.W.2d 319 Minn. 1995
Dietrich v. Canadian Pacific Ltd. 536 N.W.2d 319 Minn. 1995
Hubbard v. U.P.I., Inc., (applying McDonnell Douglas analysis to reprisal claims).
Williams v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center, Inc. 530 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Williams v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center, Inc. 530 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Pribil v. Archdiocese of St. Paul & Minneapolis 533 N.W.2d 410 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Pribil v. Archdiocese of St. Paul & Minneapolis 533 N.W.2d 410 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Hubbard v. United Press Int'l
Elstrom v. Independent School District No. 270 533 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Elstrom v. Independent School District No. 270 533 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
See Hubbard v. United Press Int'l -39 (Minn.1983).
Marriage of Kornberg v. Kornberg 525 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Marriage of Kornberg v. Kornberg 525 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Hubbard v. United Press Int’l
K.A.C. v. Benson 527 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1995
K.A.C. v. Benson 527 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1995
Hubbard v. United Press Int’l., Inc., -39 (Minn.1983).
Estate of Benson Ex Rel. Benson v. Minnesota Board of Medical Practice 526 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Estate of Benson Ex Rel. Benson v. Minnesota Board of Medical Practice 526 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
See Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc., (claims for mental anguish are speculative and likely to lead to fictitious allegations); Eklund v. Vincent Brass & Aluminum Co., (tort claims seeking damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress are disfavored); Restatement (Second) of Torts § IS6A
Johnson v. Canadian Pacific Ltd. 522 N.W.2d 386 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Johnson v. Canadian Pacific Ltd. 522 N.W.2d 386 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Hubbard v. UPI, Inc., -42 (Minn.1983).
Iacona v. Schrupp 521 N.W.2d 70 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Iacona v. Schrupp 521 N.W.2d 70 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc.
Carlson v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 520 N.W.2d 534 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Carlson v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 520 N.W.2d 534 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See Hubbard v. United Press Int'l, Inc., (defamation, malicious prosecution and other willful conduct constitute invasions of legal rights which by very nature are likely to provoke severe emotional disturbance).
Villarreal v. Independent School District No. 659 520 N.W.2d 735 Minn. 1994
Villarreal v. Independent School District No. 659 520 N.W.2d 735 Minn. 1994
See Hubbard v. United Press Inti, Inc.
Frey v. Ramsey County Community Human Services 517 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Frey v. Ramsey County Community Human Services 517 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc., -39 (Minn.1983).
Sigurdson v. Carl Bolander & Sons, Co. 511 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Sigurdson v. Carl Bolander & Sons, Co. 511 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
1843 , 1854-55 n. 15, 52 L.Ed.2d 396 (1977) (quoted in Hubbard v. United Press Int'l, Inc., , 441 n. 12 (Minn.1983)).
Giuliani v. Stuart Corp. 512 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Giuliani v. Stuart Corp. 512 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc., Bougie v. Sibley Manor, Inc.
Villarreal v. Independent School District 659 505 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Villarreal v. Independent School District 659 505 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
See Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc.
Thuma v. Kroschel 506 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Thuma v. Kroschel 506 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
2 A trial court’s findings of fact are clearly erroneous when they are not “reasonably supported by evidence in the record considered as a whole.” Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc.
Hempel v. Fairview Hospitals & Healthcare Services, Inc. 504 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Bougie v. Sibley Manor, Inc. 504 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Hempel v. Fairview Hospitals & Healthcare Services, Inc. 504 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc., -39 (Minn.1983).
Bougie v. Sibley Manor, Inc. 504 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Hubbard v. United Press Int’l., Inc., n. 11 (Minn.1983).
Dornfeld v. Oberg 503 N.W.2d 115 Minn. 1993
Dornfeld v. Oberg 503 N.W.2d 115 Minn. 1993
In Hubbard v. United Press Int'l, Inc., this court adopted the formulation set forth in section 46(1) of the Restatement (Second) of Torts with respect to the elements necessary to prove intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Soucek v. Banham 503 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Soucek v. Banham 503 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc.
Odegard v. Finne 500 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Odegard v. Finne 500 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc., -39 (Minn.1983).
Dornfeld v. Oberg 491 N.W.2d 297 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Dornfeld v. Oberg 491 N.W.2d 297 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Domfeld’s Came of Action The Minnesota Supreme Court first recognized intentional or reckless infliction of emotional distress as an independent tort in Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc.
Marriage of Bliss v. Bliss 493 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Marriage of Bliss v. Bliss 493 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc.
Gillson v. State Department of Natural Resources 492 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Gillson v. State Department of Natural Resources 492 N.W.2d 835 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
The trial court’s factual findings “will not be disturbed if they are reasonably supported by evidence in the record considered as a whole.”
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Alpine Air Products, Inc. 490 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 1992