Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc., 330 N.W.2d 428.

385 citing documents.

State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Alpine Air Products, Inc. 490 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Hubbard v. United Press Int’l
Strauss v. Thorne 490 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Strauss v. Thorne 490 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Hubbard v. United Press Int'l, Inc., -39 (Minn.1983).
Covey v. Detroit Lakes Printing Co. 490 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Covey v. Detroit Lakes Printing Co. 490 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
See Hubbard v. United Press Intl, Inc., -39 (Minn.1983).
Snesrud v. Instant Web, Inc. 484 N.W.2d 423 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Snesrud v. Instant Web, Inc. 484 N.W.2d 423 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Clearly erroneous means not “reasonably supported by evidence in the record considered as a whole.” Hubbard v. United Press Int'l, Inc.
Kay v. Peter Motor Co., Inc. 483 N.W.2d 481 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Kay v. Peter Motor Co., Inc. 483 N.W.2d 481 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc.
Mrozka v. Archdiocese of St. Paul & Mpls. 482 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Mrozka v. Archdiocese of St. Paul & Mpls. 482 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
While we recognize that the emotional distress suffered by the parents was significant, the trial court properly concluded that it was not sufficient to overcome “the high threshold standard of proof required of a complainant before [the issue] may be submitted to a jury.” Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc.
Rulli v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 479 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Rulli v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 479 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
See Jostens Inc. v. CNA Ins., Continental Casualty Co., Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, -39 (Minn.1983); Furlev Sales & Assocs.
M.H. v. Caritas Family Services 475 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
M.H. v. Caritas Family Services 475 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc., -40 (Minn.1983).
Abbett v. County of St. Louis 474 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Abbett v. County of St. Louis 474 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc.
Miller v. Centennial State Bank 472 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Miller v. Centennial State Bank 472 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc.
Bradley v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. 471 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Bradley v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. 471 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc.
Lund v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co. 467 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Lund v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co. 467 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, -39 (Minn.1983).
LaMott v. Apple Valley Health Care Center, Inc. 465 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
LaMott v. Apple Valley Health Care Center, Inc. 465 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Co., (citing Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc., ).
Paper v. Rent-A-Wreck 463 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Paper v. Rent-A-Wreck 463 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc.
Turner v. IDS Financial Services, Inc. 459 N.W.2d 143 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Turner v. IDS Financial Services, Inc. 459 N.W.2d 143 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
See, Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.
Larson v. Dunn 460 N.W.2d 39 Minn. 1990
Larson v. Dunn 460 N.W.2d 39 Minn. 1990
-39 (Minn.1983) (recognizing IIED).
Melsha v. Wickes Companies, Inc. 459 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Melsha v. Wickes Companies, Inc. 459 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
See Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, , 440 n. 11 (Minn.1983) (discussing the continuous violation doctrine).
McIntire v. State 458 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
McIntire v. State 458 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc. , , 442 (Minn. 1983).
Holman v. CPT CORP. 457 N.W.2d 740 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Holman v. CPT CORP. 457 N.W.2d 740 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In her brief, Holman raises a claim of retaliatory discharge, citing Hubbard v. United States Press International, Inc., : In order to establish a prima facie case where an alleged retaliatory discharge is involved, an employee must establish: (1) statutorily-protected conduct by the employee; (2) adverse employment action by the employer; and (3) a casual connection between the two.
State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Moorhead State University 455 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Moorhead State University 455 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.
Johnson v. Morris 453 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1990
Johnson v. Morris 453 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1990
Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, -39 (Minn.1983).
Larson v. Dunn 449 N.W.2d 751 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Larson v. Dunn 449 N.W.2d 751 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
See Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc., -39 (Minn.1983).
Anderson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. 449 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Anderson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. 449 N.W.2d 468 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc., -99 (Minn.1978).
Rutherford v. County of Kandiyohi 449 N.W.2d 457 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Rutherford v. County of Kandiyohi 449 N.W.2d 457 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Sigurdson v. Isanti County 448 N.W.2d 62 Minn. 1989
Sigurdson v. Isanti County 448 N.W.2d 62 Minn. 1989
Cf. Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc., , 441 n. 11 (Minn.1983).
Stubbs v. North Memorial Medical Center 448 N.W.2d 78 Minn. Ct. App. 1989