Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Moberg v. Independent School District No. 281, 336 N.W.2d 510.

44 citing documents.

ROA Rochester, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Save Indus Group, et al., Relators, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
No. 281, (quotation omitted).
834 Voice v. Independent School District No. 834 893 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
834 Voice v. Independent School District No. 834 893 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
No. 281, (noting a school board’s “wide discretion” in school-closing decisions, and observing that it is for “the locally elected representatives to receive public input, and weigh and resolve [school-closing] conflicts”).
Tony Thiel, Relator v. Independent School District No. 803 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Tony Thiel, Relator v. Independent School District No. 803 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Mark R. Zweber v. Credit River Township 882 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 2016
Mark R. Zweber v. Credit River Township 882 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 2016
No. 281, (“[A] writ of certiorari is the proper form of action for challenging a school closing decision, rather than the declaratory judgment action brought in this case.”).
In the Matter of the Petition of Northern States Power Company, d/b/a Xcel Energy, for Approval of Its … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Petition of Northern States Power Company, d/b/a Xcel Energy, for Approval of Its … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Re: Declaring a Negative Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Living Word Bible Camp Project. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Re: Declaring a Negative Need for an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Living Word Bible Camp Project. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Mankato Free Press Co. v. City of North Mankato 563 N.W.2d 291 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Mankato Free Press Co. v. City of North Mankato 563 N.W.2d 291 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Claude v. Collins 518 N.W.2d 836 Minn. 1994
Claude v. Collins 518 N.W.2d 836 Minn. 1994
In Moberg v. Independent School District No. 281, we approved of the trial court’s definition that a “meeting” for the purposes of the Open Meeting Law occurs when at least a quorum of a governmental body intentionally meets to discuss the business of that body.
Claude v. Collins 507 N.W.2d 452 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Claude v. Collins 507 N.W.2d 452 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
No. 281, (defining “meeting”).
Thuma v. Kroschel 506 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Thuma v. Kroschel 506 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
No. 281, (citation omitted) (emphasis added).
Sovereign v. Dunn 498 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Sovereign v. Dunn 498 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Willison v. Pine Point Experimental School 464 N.W.2d 742 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Willison v. Pine Point Experimental School 464 N.W.2d 742 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11 459 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 1990
Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11 459 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 1990
No. 281, we said “a writ of certiorari is the proper form for challenging a school closing decision, rather than the declaratory judgment action brought in this case.” (Emphasis added.)
Silver Bay Area Citizens Concerned for Quality Education v. Lake Superior School District No. 381 448 N.W.2d 92 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Silver Bay Area Citizens Concerned for Quality Education v. Lake Superior School District No. 381 448 N.W.2d 92 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Moberg v. Independent School District No. 281
National Can Corp. v. Commissioner of Revenue 437 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1989
National Can Corp. v. Commissioner of Revenue 437 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1989
Moberg v. Independent School District # 281
Concerned Citizens for the Preservation of Independent School District No. 712 v. Mountain Iron-Buhl Independent School District No. … 431 N.W.2d 601 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Concerned Citizens for the Preservation of Independent School District No. 712 v. Mountain Iron-Buhl Independent School District No. … 431 N.W.2d 601 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See Moberg v. Independent School District No. 281, Kelly v. Independent School District No. 623
The Minnesota Daily v. University of Minnesota 432 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
The Minnesota Daily v. University of Minnesota 432 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
The supreme court has endorsed a balancing test between “the public’s right to be informed” and its “right to the effective and efficient administration of public bodies.” Moberg v. Independent School District No. 281
Handle With Care, Inc. v. Department of Human Services 406 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1987
Handle With Care, Inc. v. Department of Human Services 406 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1987
See, , 792 n. 5 (Minn.1985); Moberg v. Independent School District No. 281
Bena Parent Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 115 381 N.W.2d 517 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bena Parent Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 115 381 N.W.2d 517 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Moberg v. Independent School District No. 281, -16 (Minn.1983).
Kelly v. Independent School District No. 623 380 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Kelly v. Independent School District No. 623 380 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
We recognize the importance of public input but “[s]uch testimony *836 is only one factor the Board must consider in reaching a decision.” Moberg v. Independent School District No. 281
Bohm v. Independent School Dist. No. 283 358 N.W.2d 146 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Bohm v. Independent School Dist. No. 283 358 N.W.2d 146 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
No. 281, Goodman v. State, Department of Public Safety
Merz v. Leitch 342 N.W.2d 141 Minn. 1984
Merz v. Leitch 342 N.W.2d 141 Minn. 1984
However, we suggested in Moberg v. Independent School District No. 281, that notice and openness of a meeting are more important than whether action is actually taken or contemplated at the meeting or whether anyone is affected by the action so taken.