Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Davidson, 351 N.W.2d 8.
- State v. Carnahan 482 N.W.2d 793 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-
State v. Carnahan
482 N.W.2d 793
Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-12 (Minn.1984) (prior conviction evidence where defendant accused as felon in possession of handgun).
- State v. Parker 417 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 1988
-
State v. Parker
417 N.W.2d 643
Minn. 1988
(cited with approval in Berkelman, d at 396 ).
- Lande v. State 406 N.W.2d 574 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Lande v. State 406 N.W.2d 574 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Allen 375 N.W.2d 82 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
State v. Allen
375 N.W.2d 82
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
the Minnesota Supreme Court set forth the standard to be applied in future cases: We believe that generally in a prosecution for being a felon in possession of a weapon the defendant should be permitted to remove the issue of whether he is a convicted felon by stipulating to that fact.
- State v. Clark 375 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Clark 375 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. McGhee 359 N.W.2d 286 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
State v. McGhee
359 N.W.2d 286
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
decided after the trial court declined to accept appellant’s offer to stipulate, the Minnesota Supreme Court held it was error to refuse acceptance of a stipulation to prior felony convictions which would remove the issue of a felon in possession of handgun prosecution from the jury.
- State v. Braun 354 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Braun 354 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Berkelman 355 N.W.2d 394 Minn. 1984
-
State v. Berkelman
355 N.W.2d 394
Minn. 1984
we held that in a prosecution of a defendant for being a felon in possession of a handgun, the trial court erred in refusing to accept a stipulation and let the defendant remove from the jury the issue of whether the defendant was a felon.
- State v. Wendroth 352 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
State v. Wendroth
352 N.W.2d 133
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
for discussion of defendant’s right to stipulate to a prior conviction.