Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Matter of Welfare of C. Children, 348 N.W.2d 94.

28 citing documents.

John Robinson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. R. T. and K. M. W., Jr., … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
1 (2020) (stating that “ [t]he juvenile court has original and exclusive jurisdiction in proceedings concerning any child who is alleged to be in need of protection or services”); In re Welfare of C., Child., (stating that “[j]uvenile courts have continuing jurisdiction over matters not directly involved in or essential to the appeal” and that, pending an appeal, they retain “a residuum of jurisdiction to handle issues involving the child’s welfare.”) The district court’s jurisdiction over the u
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: Q. S. M. and T. R. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-72 (Minn. 1976) (holding tha t findings explaining a distric t court’s exercise of its discretion are necessary to assure that the relevant factors have been addressed, to provide appellate courts with an adequate basis to review the exercise of that discretion, and to assure the parties that the relev ant factors have been consider ed); In re Welfare of C. 11 Children, (applying Rosenfeld in a juvenile protection case).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: G. R., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Grein v. Grein , (declining to re mand custody decision when it was clear from the record that the court would make the same findings and reach the same conclusion); (concluding that even if certain evidence was improperly admitted, the improperly admitted evidence was a harmless error because it did not impact the party’s substantive rights).
Marriage of Perry v. Perry 749 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Marriage of Perry v. Perry 749 N.W.2d 399 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
(discussing changing circumstances of child’s life).
In Re the Welfare of P.R.L. 606 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
In Re the Welfare of P.R.L. 606 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
As we have noted before, “‘[t]he circumstances of a child’s life change more rapidly and are subject to a wider range of external factors than is true for most adults.’ ” (quoting ABA, Juvenile Justice Standards Relating to Appeals and Collateral Review, Commentary, § 6.1 (1980)).
In Re the Welfare of D.M.D. 438 N.W.2d 713 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re the Welfare of D.M.D. 438 N.W.2d 713 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
(quoting Jenson v. Touche Ross & Co., ).
In re the Welfare of R.L.A. 431 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In re the Welfare of R.L.A. 431 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Fette v. Peterson 406 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Fette v. Peterson 406 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
§ 117.045 (1982) raises a matter independent of the merits and a trial court has continuing jurisdiction to award such fees after an appeal is perfected); (juvenile court retained authority to modify disposition of child but did not retain the power to alter its adjudication of neglect once appeal of the determination was perfected).
In re the Welfare of M.E.W. 400 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In re the Welfare of M.E.W. 400 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of B.M. 383 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Welfare of B.M. 383 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Welfare of C. Children, (wife’s passive acceptance of husband’s sexual improprieties towards daughters supported finding of neglect).
In Re the Welfare of R.A. 375 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of R.A. 375 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Redding v. Redding 372 N.W.2d 31 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Redding v. Redding 372 N.W.2d 31 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In re the Welfare of L.P.C. 367 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In re the Welfare of L.P.C. 367 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of S.J. 367 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of S.J. 367 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Muecke v. State 348 N.W.2d 808 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Muecke v. State 348 N.W.2d 808 Minn. Ct. App. 1984