Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Pikula v. Pikula, 374 N.W.2d 705.
-
Marriage of Courey v. Courey
524 N.W.2d 469
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
(sets out standard followed in custody cases).
- Dabill v. Dabill 514 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Dabill v. Dabill 514 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Marriage of Schumm v. Schumm 510 N.W.2d 13 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Marriage of Schumm v. Schumm 510 N.W.2d 13 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- In Re the Custody of S.E.G. 507 N.W.2d 872 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- In Re the Custody of S.E.G. 507 N.W.2d 872 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Marriage Of: Wopata v. Wopata 498 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
Marriage Of: Wopata v. Wopata
498 N.W.2d 478
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(“[t]he guiding principle in all custody cases is the best interests of the child”).
- Marriage of Coleman v. Coleman 493 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Marriage of Coleman v. Coleman 493 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Spaeth v. Warren 478 N.W.2d 319 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Marriage of Dabrowski v. Dabrowski 477 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Marriage of Dabrowski v. Dabrowski 477 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Marriage of Harkema v. Harkema 474 N.W.2d 10 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Marriage of Harkema v. Harkema 474 N.W.2d 10 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Marriage of Baum v. Baum 465 N.W.2d 598 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Marriage of Baum v. Baum 465 N.W.2d 598 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Marriage of Westphal v. Westphal 457 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- Marriage of Westphal v. Westphal 457 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- Klecker v. Klecker 454 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-
Klecker v. Klecker
454 N.W.2d 264
Minn. Ct. App. 1990
2 (“The guiding principle in all custody cases is the best interest of the child”).
- Marriage of Lilleboe v. Lilleboe 453 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- Marriage of Lilleboe v. Lilleboe 453 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- Marriage of Maxfield v. Maxfield 452 N.W.2d 219 Minn. 1990
-
Marriage of Maxfield v. Maxfield
452 N.W.2d 219
Minn. 1990
After making the foregoing findings of fact, the trial court then made the following (here summarized) conclusions of law: (1) When the parties separated in April 1987
- Marriage of Maxfield v. Maxfield 439 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-
Marriage of Maxfield v. Maxfield
439 N.W.2d 411
Minn. Ct. App. 1989
With regard to custody, did not apply in this case.
- Durkin v. Hinich 442 N.W.2d 148 Minn. 1989
- Durkin v. Hinich 442 N.W.2d 148 Minn. 1989
- Durkin v. Hinich 431 N.W.2d 553 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Durkin v. Hinich 431 N.W.2d 553 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Marriage of Tiggelaar v. Tiggelaar 433 N.W.2d 145 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
Marriage of Tiggelaar v. Tiggelaar
433 N.W.2d 145
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
“Continuity of care with the primary caretaker is not only central and crucial to the best interest of the child, but is perhaps the single predicator of a child’s well-being * *
- Marriage of McKee-Johnson v. Johnson 429 N.W.2d 689 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- In Re the Welfare of J.G.W. 429 N.W.2d 284 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- In Re the Welfare of J.G.W. 429 N.W.2d 284 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
Marriage of McKee-Johnson v. Johnson
429 N.W.2d 689
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
the court found that McKee-Johnson was the primary parent during the marriage and that it would be in Daniel’s best interests that she have physical custody, subject to a visitation schedule allowing Johnson to spend approximately 45% of the year with Daniel.
- Doren v. Doren 431 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Doren v. Doren 431 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- In Re the Marriage of McCabe v. McCabe 430 N.W.2d 870 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- In Re the Marriage of McCabe v. McCabe 430 N.W.2d 870 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Lenz v. Lenz 430 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1988
- Lenz v. Lenz 430 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1988
- LaValle v. LaValle 430 N.W.2d 224 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- LaValle v. LaValle 430 N.W.2d 224 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Marriage of Gorz v. Gorz 428 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Marriage of Gorz v. Gorz 428 N.W.2d 839 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Marriage of Sinsabaugh v. Heinerscheid 428 N.W.2d 476 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
Marriage of Sinsabaugh v. Heinerscheid
428 N.W.2d 476
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
as of the parties’ date of sepa *478 ration.