Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Van De Loo v. Van De Loo, 346 N.W.2d 173.

108 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
rict court’s ruling that the 5.78-acre property is nonmarital and remand for the district court to consider whether the order still constitutes “a just and equitable division of the marital property,” considering all relevant statutory factors and circumstances, including whether either spouse’s resources or property are “so inadequate as to work an unfair hardship.” (citing Minn. Stat. § 518.58 (1982)).2 IV Beth Ann also challenges the district court’s denial of her request for attorney fees an
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Marie Tiedke, nka Kathleen Marie Freitag, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See id.; -86 (Minn. App. 1993)
In re the Marriage of: Amy Alyssa Post, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A17-1687 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Berger, 308 Minn. at 428, d at 83 7; Wopata v. Wopata , d 478, 485-86 (Minn. App. 1993); Van de Loo v. Van de Loo , -66 (Minn. App. 1984).
In re the Marriage of: Andrew Scott Green, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Denise Kaye Newman v. Thomas Joseph Newman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Denise Kaye Newman v. Thomas Joseph Newman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In Re the Marriage of Melius v. Melius 765 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Marriage of Melius v. Melius 765 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Grigsby v. Grigsby 648 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Grigsby v. Grigsby 648 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Similarly, we applied the analytical approach to a question whether monies received by a spouse in settlement of a personal injury claim should be considered marital property.
Marriage of Prahl v. Prahl 627 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Prahl v. Prahl 627 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc. 505 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1993
Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc. 505 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1993
as authority for an appellate court reviewing a question of law de novo.
Marriage Of: Wopata v. Wopata 498 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marriage Of: Wopata v. Wopata 498 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(reservation of maintenance issue was not *486 an abuse of discretion where wife’s cancer, although in remission, could recur).
Marriage of Dabrowski v. Dabrowski 477 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Dabrowski v. Dabrowski 477 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Pettit v. Pettit 472 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Pettit v. Pettit 472 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Dorso Trailer Sales, Inc. v. American Body & Trailer, Inc. 464 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Dorso Trailer Sales, Inc. v. American Body & Trailer, Inc. 464 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Servs., Inc., (conclusions of law do not bind this court); (“The appellate courts need not * * * defer to the trial court in reviewing questions of law.”).
Marriage of Ward v. Ward 453 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Marriage of Ward v. Ward 453 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In Re the Marriage of Steffan 423 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In Re the Marriage of Steffan 423 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Jacobson v. World of Computers, Inc. 416 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Duffey v. Duffey 416 N.W.2d 830 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Duffey v. Duffey 416 N.W.2d 830 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Jacobson v. World of Computers, Inc. 416 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
“Appellate courts need not defer to the trial court in reviewing questions of law.” ( (citations omitted)).
Marriage of Larkin v. Larkin 415 N.W.2d 924 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Larkin v. Larkin 415 N.W.2d 924 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
“Appellate courts need not defer to the trial court in reviewing questions of law.” ( (citations omitted).
Marriage of Dorweiler v. Dorweiler 413 N.W.2d 572 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Dorweiler v. Dorweiler 413 N.W.2d 572 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Scholle v. Scholle 411 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Scholle v. Scholle 411 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Demning v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance 411 N.W.2d 571 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Demning v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance 411 N.W.2d 571 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Redding v. Oldewartel 411 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Redding v. Oldewartel 411 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Kvenild v. Kvenild 410 N.W.2d 70 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Kvenild v. Kvenild 410 N.W.2d 70 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Hafner v. Hafner 406 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Hafner v. Hafner 406 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Salstrom v. Salstrom 404 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Salstrom v. Salstrom 404 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(citing Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc., and A.J.
State, City of Eden Prairie v. Liepke 403 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 1987