Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, 369 N.W.2d 530.

73 citing documents.

Computer Tool & Engineering, Inc. v. Northern States Power Co. 453 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
*573 Rate-making is a quasi-legislative function, and decisions of the commission “command the same regard and are subject to the same tests as enactments of the legislature.” Minneapolis Street Railway Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 251 Minn. 43, 71
In Re the Joint Petition of Space Center Transport 444 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re the Joint Petition of Space Center Transport 444 N.W.2d 575 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Petition of Minnesota Power & Light Co. 435 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Petition of Minnesota Power & Light Co. 435 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
: The legislature states what the agency is to do and how it is to do it.
In Re De Laria Transport, Inc. 427 N.W.2d 745 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In Re De Laria Transport, Inc. 427 N.W.2d 745 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 420 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 420 N.W.2d 646 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
the supreme court addressed the question whether the Public Utilities Commission had implied authority under its statutes to refund improperly collected rates charged by a public utility.
In Re the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission's Initiation of Summary Investigation 417 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission's Initiation of Summary Investigation 417 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
the court again indicated that a lack of express statutory authority required reversal of a Commission decision.
Northern States Power Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 414 N.W.2d 383 Minn. 1987
Distinguished Northern States Power Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 414 N.W.2d 383 Minn. 1987
as only those powers given to it by the legislature” and “any reasonable doubt of the existence of any particular power in the commission should be resolved against the exercise of such power.” More recently, in a case factually distinguishable upon the basis that the issue was an agency’s authority to enforce its own order, -35 (Minn.1985), we concluded that the Commission was without the power to order a refund of discriminatory rates even when the utility had violated the Commission's order b
Petition of New Ulm Telecom, Inc. 399 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Petition of New Ulm Telecom, Inc. 399 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
3 In making such a determination, rev’g
In Re State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 392 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 392 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
However, “express statutory authority need not be given a cramped reading * * *.”
In Re Wage & Hour Violations of Holly Inn, Inc. 386 N.W.2d 305 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re Wage & Hour Violations of Holly Inn, Inc. 386 N.W.2d 305 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Hanna Mining Co. v. InterNorth, Inc. 379 N.W.2d 663 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Hanna Mining Co. v. InterNorth, Inc. 379 N.W.2d 663 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Minnesota Public *667 Utilities Commission
Application of Northwestern Bell Telephone 371 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Application of Northwestern Bell Telephone 371 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Implied powers “must be fairly drawn and fairly evident *566 from the agency objectives and powers expressly given by the legislature.”