Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, 369 N.W.2d 530.

73 citing documents.

Moline Machinery, LLC, et al., Appellants, vs. City of Duluth, Respondent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Moline Machinery, LLC, et al., Appellants, vs. City of Duluth, Respondent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A24-1454 A24-1455 A24-1700 A24-1741 A24-1750 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Hibbing Taconite Company, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Surveillance and Integrity Review (SIRS) Appeals by Trinity Home Health Care Services and … Minn. 2023
In the Matter of the Surveillance and Integrity Review (SIRS) Appeals by Trinity Home Health Care Services and … Minn. 2023
In the Matter of the Surveillance and Integrity Review (SIRS) Appeals by Trinity Home Health Care Services and … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A20-0116 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In the Matter of the Application of Otter Tail Power Company for Authority to Increase Rates for Electric … Minn. 2020
In the Matter of the Application of Minnesota Power for Authority to Increase Rates for Electric Service in … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, et al., Petitioners, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Terminal Transport, Inc. v. Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Association 862 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Terminal Transport, Inc. v. Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Association 862 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Siewert v. Northern States Power Co. 793 N.W.2d 272 Minn. 2011
Siewert v. Northern States Power Co. 793 N.W.2d 272 Minn. 2011
Comm’n, (holding that the MPUC does not have statutory authority to order refunds of past revenue collections).
In Re Excelsior Energy, Inc. 782 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In Re Excelsior Energy, Inc. 782 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In Re Hubbard 778 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 2010
In Re Hubbard 778 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 2010
Hoffman v. Northern States Power Co. 764 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 2009
Hoffman v. Northern States Power Co. 764 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 2009
We have described the public regulation of utilities as “an intricate, ongoing process” subject to “an ever-widening set of consequences and adjustments.”
Hoffman v. Northern States Power Co. 743 N.W.2d 751 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Hoffman v. Northern States Power Co. 743 N.W.2d 751 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Comm’n, ) (recognizing that “the regulations of rates is an ‘intricate, ongoing process’ and interference by a court ‘may set in motion an ever-widening set of consequences and adjustments’ which courts are powerless to address”).
Schermer v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 721 N.W.2d 307 Minn. 2006
Schermer v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 721 N.W.2d 307 Minn. 2006
In Re an Investigation Into the Commission's Jurisdiction Over the Hutchinson's Intrastate Natural Gas Pipeline 707 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re an Investigation Into the Commission's Jurisdiction Over the Hutchinson's Intrastate Natural Gas Pipeline 707 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Comm’n, (holding that the commission lacked express or implied authority to enforce its own orders by ordering a customer refund; noting that other enforcement tools were available in the statutes).
Rowe v. Department of Employment & Economic Development 704 N.W.2d 191 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Rowe v. Department of Employment & Economic Development 704 N.W.2d 191 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re Qwest's Wholesale Service Quality Standards 702 N.W.2d 246 Minn. 2005
In Re Qwest's Wholesale Service Quality Standards 702 N.W.2d 246 Minn. 2005
Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Integra Telecom, Inc. 697 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Integra Telecom, Inc. 697 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Comm’n, (stating that the public utilities commission, as a creature of statute, “has only those powers given to it by the legislature”) (quotation omitted).
Northern States Power Co. v. City of Oakdale 588 N.W.2d 534 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Northern States Power Co. v. City of Oakdale 588 N.W.2d 534 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Application of Minnegasco 565 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1997
Application of Minnegasco 565 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1997
Comm’n, -36 (Minn.1985) (holding that the Commission lacked express or implied authority to enforce .its own orders by ordering a customer refund; noting that other enforcement tools were available in the statutes).
Application of Minnegasco 556 N.W.2d 607 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Application of Minnegasco 556 N.W.2d 607 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Minnegasco v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 549 N.W.2d 904 Minn. 1996
Minnegasco v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 549 N.W.2d 904 Minn. 1996
Petition of Minnesota Power 545 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Petition of Minnesota Power 545 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Hirsch v. Bartley-Lindsay Co. 537 N.W.2d 480 Minn. 1995
Hirsch v. Bartley-Lindsay Co. 537 N.W.2d 480 Minn. 1995
While express statutory authority need not be given a cramped reading, any enlargement of express powers by implication must be fairly drawn and fairly evident from the agency objectives and powers expressly given by the legislature.”
Weber v. City of Inver Grove Heights 461 N.W.2d 918 Minn. 1990
Weber v. City of Inver Grove Heights 461 N.W.2d 918 Minn. 1990
“[A]ny enlargement of express powers by implication must be fairly drawn and fairly evident from the agency objectives and powers expressly given by the legislature.” Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Comm’n
In re An Investigation of Unfair Election Practices Objections 461 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1990
In re An Investigation of Unfair Election Practices Objections 461 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1990
The question becomes, then, whether the power to vacate elections may be implied, i.e., whether this implied power may be “fairly drawn and fairly evident from the agency objectives and powers expressly given by the legislature.” Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Comm’n
Computer Tool & Engineering, Inc. v. Northern States Power Co. 453 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1990