Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Klapmeier v. Town of Center of Crow Wing County, 346 N.W.2d 133.

32 citing documents.

Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, et al v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Poly Met Mining, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
B. Laches The doctrine of laches is intended to “prevent one who has not been diligent in asserting a known right from recovering at the expense of one who has been prejudiced by the delay.” Klapmeier v. Town of Center , (quotation omitted).
Michele Sykes v. Rochester City Council, City of Rochester Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Michele Sykes v. Rochester City Council, City of Rochester Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sykes v. City of Rochester 787 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Sykes v. City of Rochester 787 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Commissioner of Natural Resources v. Nicollet County Public Water/Wetlands Hearings Unit 633 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Commissioner of Natural Resources v. Nicollet County Public Water/Wetlands Hearings Unit 633 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re the Marriage of Opp 516 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
In Re the Marriage of Opp 516 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
(quoting Aronovitch v. Levy, 238 Minn. 237, 242 , ).
Byrd v. Independent School District No. 194 495 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Byrd v. Independent School District No. 194 495 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
We agree that this extraordinary cooperation “casts a cloud over the integrity of the process used in awarding the contract.” Ill The purpose of laches is “to prevent one who has not been diligent in asserting a known right from recovering at the expense of one who has been prejudiced by the delay.” (quoting Aronovitch v. Levy, 238 Minn. 237, 242 , ).
Eide v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 492 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Eide v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 492 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Green Electric System, Inc. v. Metropolitan Airports Commission 486 N.W.2d 819 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Leisure Hills of Grand Rapids, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 480 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Leisure Hills of Grand Rapids, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 480 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Ruzic v. City of Eden Prairie 479 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Ruzic v. City of Eden Prairie 479 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In re Special Assessment by City of Moorhead, 239 Minn. 351, 356 , Independent Sch.
In Re Channel Lane 444 N.W.2d 602 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Broadbent v. City of East Bethel 444 N.W.2d 602 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Broadbent v. City of East Bethel 444 N.W.2d 602 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re Channel Lane 444 N.W.2d 602 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Countryside Village v. City of North Branch 442 N.W.2d 304 Minn. 1989
Countryside Village v. City of North Branch 442 N.W.2d 304 Minn. 1989
However, that failure to mention appeal rights in published and mailed notice given in the course of a special assessment proceeding rendered the notice defective and left the town board without jurisdiction.
Countryside Village v. City of North Branch 430 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Countryside Village v. City of North Branch 430 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Shortridge v. Daubney 425 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 1988
Shortridge v. Daubney 425 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 1988
Independent School District 254 v. City of Kenyon 411 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Independent School District 254 v. City of Kenyon 411 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(there must be strict compliance with the statutory notice provisions of Minn.Stat.
Shortridge v. Daubney 400 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Shortridge v. Daubney 400 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 1987