Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Dibley, 400 N.W.2d 186.

24 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Michael Benson. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
We have noted on numerous occasions that we will not speculate on what might have occurred “without any evidentiary support.” E.g., In re Dibley , - 91 (Minn. App. 1987) , rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Nicholas Scott Thompson. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Jestin Erickson Ledlum. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. Mar.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Mark Jeffrey Dunker. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Mar.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Matthew Alan Radke. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
8 In re Dibley , review denied (Minn. Mar.
In re Commitment of Johnson 931 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re Commitment of Johnson 931 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
26, 1985); see also In re Dibley , , 190 (Minn. App. 1987) (noting that this court has adopted the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel standard for criminal cases in the civil-commitment context), review denied (Minn. Mar.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Chester Lee Grauberger. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Mar.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Edward Eugene Dooley. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Mar.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Alan Joseph Schiller. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Mar.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: John Joseph Kotowski. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: John Joseph Kotowski. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Mar.
Beaulieu v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 798 N.W.2d 542 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Beaulieu v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 798 N.W.2d 542 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
26, 1985); review denied (Minn. Mar.
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Wicka 461 N.W.2d 236 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Wicka 461 N.W.2d 236 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Dr. Brauer’s lack of personal acquaintance with Kintop is “more pertinent to the weight to be afforded the testimony than to its admissibility.” ( pet.
Matter of Schauer 450 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Matter of Schauer 450 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
(), pet for rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
Matter of Jost 449 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1990
Matter of Jost 449 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1990
Compare -88 (Minn.App.1987) and with d at 90 .
Matter of Clements 440 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Matter of Clements 440 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Citing Harhut , we stated in (Minn.Ct.App.
In Re the Welfare of Hofmaster 434 N.W.2d 279 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re the Welfare of Hofmaster 434 N.W.2d 279 Minn. Ct. App. 1989