Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ocel v. City of Eagan, 402 N.W.2d 531.
-
City of Jackson, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See, e.g., Ocel v. City of Eagan , -33 (Minn. 1987) (applying section 541.051, subdivision 1(a), in a case involving damage caused by surface water discharged by city’s sewer system); Cap.
-
James Aeshliman, et al., Appellants,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
1 (1988); Frederickson v. Alton M. Johnson Co. , -97 (Minn. 1987) (electrical system); Ocel v. City of Eagan , -34 (Minn. 1987) (storm sewer system); Allianz Ins.
- Glendalough Homeowners' Association v. Jovani Nassar, and third party v. Evermoor Community Association, third party Community Development, Inc., … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Glendalough Homeowners' Association v. Jovani Nassar, and third party v. Evermoor Community Association, third party Community Development, Inc., …
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The negligent-maintenance exception to section 541.051 applies to activities that “generally occur after an improvement is built” and “are usually performed by an owner or tenant,” and is meant “to leave undisturbed the limitation period for ordinary landowner’s liability.”
- Gregory Monson v. Jeff Suck 855 N.W.2d 323 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
Gregory Monson v. Jeff Suck
855 N.W.2d 323
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Furthermore, Olmanson is consistent with the supreme court’s in which the supreme court stated rather broadly, “The intent of the exception appears to be .
- Nelson v. Short-Elliot-Hendrickson, Inc. 716 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
-
Nelson v. Short-Elliot-Hendrickson, Inc.
716 N.W.2d 394
Minn. Ct. App. 2006
See, Capitol Supply Co. v. City of St.
- Olmanson v. Le Sueur County 673 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- Distinguished Olmanson v. Le Sueur County 673 N.W.2d 506 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- Nolan and Nolan v. City of Eagan 673 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- Nolan and Nolan v. City of Eagan 673 N.W.2d 487 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- Boyum v. Main Entree, Inc. 535 N.W.2d 389 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-
Boyum v. Main Entree, Inc.
535 N.W.2d 389
Minn. Ct. App. 1995
More recently, the supreme court held that the intent of the exception “appears to be, as the trial court observed, to leave undisturbed the limitation period for ordinary landowner’s liability.”
- Williams v. Tweed 520 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Arden Hills North Homes Ass'n v. Pemtom, Inc. 475 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
-
Arden Hills North Homes Ass'n v. Pemtom, Inc.
475 N.W.2d 495
Minn. Ct. App. 1991
(flooding caused by defective septic system); (explosion caused by defective switchboard); Bulan v. Hector Plumbing & Heating Co., (fire caused by defective fireplace); (flooding caused by defective sewage system); (electric shock caused by defective transformer vault); (flooding caused by defective drainage system); Capitol Supply Co. v. City of St.
- Minnesota Landmarks v. M.A. Mortenson Co. 466 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Minnesota Landmarks v. M.A. Mortenson Co. 466 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- Western Lake Superior Sanitary District v. Orfei & Sons, Inc. 463 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-
Western Lake Superior Sanitary District v. Orfei & Sons, Inc.
463 N.W.2d 781
Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Capitol Supply Co. v. City of St.
- O'Connor v. M.A. Mortenson Co. 424 N.W.2d 92 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- O'Connor v. M.A. Mortenson Co. 424 N.W.2d 92 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Sherbrook Co. v. E & H Earth Movers, Inc. 419 N.W.2d 818 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
Sherbrook Co. v. E & H Earth Movers, Inc.
419 N.W.2d 818
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(flooding caused by defective septic system); (explosion caused by defective switchboard); (fire caused by defective fireplace); (flooding caused by defective sewage system); (electric shock caused by defective transformer vault); (flooding caused by defective drainage system); Capitol Supply Co. v. City of St.
- Wittmer v. Ruegemer 419 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1988
- Wittmer v. Ruegemer 419 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1988