Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Clipper, 429 N.W.2d 698.

27 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“A jury can properly accept an owner’s testimony as to the value of his or her own property.” d 698, 700 (Minn. App. 1988).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See, (concluding that defendant could receive a criminal-history point for a fel ony conviction for whic h imposition of sentence was stayed, notwithstanding a statute that provided that felony conviction for burglary on 8 which imposition of sentence was stayed wo uld appear on defendant’s rec
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A jury can properly accept an owner’s testimony as to the value of his or her own property.”
State of Minnesota v. Robert Darryl Boettcher Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Robert Darryl Boettcher Minn. Ct. App. 2015
To argue that the absence of testimony as to an item’s worth is fatal to a fact-finder’s valuation of that item, (upholding inference that total replacement value of items of stolen property was more than $1,000 in light of testimony that purchase prices totaled about $1,790).
State of Minnesota v. Vennie Jerome Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Vennie Jerome Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2015
value of the various items of property based on their original purchase prices.” –700 (Minn. App. 1988); see also State v. Arnold, 292 Minn. 495, 496, (holding that owner’s testimony about price of property purchased two years before theft and jury’s physical observation of property “constituted a substantial compliance with the statute”).
State of Minnesota v. Caroline Mildred Jochum Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Caroline Mildred Jochum Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Foot v. Yorkshire Fire Ins.
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Thomas Leonsaco Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Thomas Leonsaco Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. John Joseph Lynch Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. John Joseph Lynch Minn. Ct. App. 2014
this court affirmed a theft conviction despite the defendant’s argument that the evidence was insufficient to show the value of the stolen property where the value was proved by testimony from the property owner regarding the original price paid for the items and the items’ present condition
State v. Ohrt 619 N.W.2d 790 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Ohrt 619 N.W.2d 790 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
1(2) (1998) (providing that if felony defendant given stay of imposition successfully serves probation the conviction is deemed to be a misdemeanor); United States v. Johnson, 43 F.3d 1211, 1214-15 (8th Cir.1995) (holding that Minnesota stay of imposition is “sentence” for purposes of federal sentencing guidelines even if no term of probation was imposed); (holding that “felony conviction” for which imposition of sentence was stayed could be counted as prior felony conviction under sentencing gu
In Re the Disciplinary Hearing Regarding the Peace Officer License of Woollett 540 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 1995
In Re the Disciplinary Hearing Regarding the Peace Officer License of Woollett 540 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 1995
452-53 n. 1 (Minn.App.1988).
In re the Disciplinary Hearing Regarding the Peace Officer License of Woollett 527 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
In re the Disciplinary Hearing Regarding the Peace Officer License of Woollett 527 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
as authority for its argument that Minn.R.
State v. LaDoucer 477 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. LaDoucer 477 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
(felony conviction for which imposition of sentence is stayed shall be assigned a felony point in calculating criminal history score); (pardoned felony convictions are included in calculation of criminal history score), pet.
State v. Moon 455 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Distinguished State v. Moon 455 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
The state’s is also unpersuasive.
State v. Dyer 438 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Dyer 438 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State v. Skramstad 433 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Skramstad 433 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-01 (Minn.Ct.App.1988) (criminal history point assigned for prior felony despite stay of imposition of sentence).