Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Michaelson v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., 474 N.W.2d 174.
- Joseph Eilefson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-
Minn. 2021
Co., (“An employer may include such a contract disclaimer as a valid expression of its intentions.”) , aff’d, (mem.); Audette v. Ne.
-
Donald Hall, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Co., (holding that disclaimer in handbook was valid expression of employer’s intentions), aff’d mem., see also Audette v. Northeast State Bank , 436 (holding that language stating that handbook “is not intended to create a contr
- Coursolle v. EMC Insurance Group, Inc. 794 N.W.2d 652 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
- Coursolle v. EMC Insurance Group, Inc. 794 N.W.2d 652 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
- Kidwell v. Sybaritic, Inc. 784 N.W.2d 220 Minn. 2010
- Kidwell v. Sybaritic, Inc. 784 N.W.2d 220 Minn. 2010
- Roberts v. Brunswick Corp. 783 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-
Roberts v. Brunswick Corp.
783 N.W.2d 226
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Co., (holding that disclaimer in handbook was valid expression of employer’s intentions), aff'd mem., Audette v. Ne.
- Alexandria Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. Rost 756 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
Alexandria Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. Rost
756 N.W.2d 896
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Co., (holding that disclaimer in handbook was “valid expression of [employer’s] intentions”), aff'd mem., (holding that language stating that handbook “is not intended to create a contract” was “understandab
- Kidwell v. Sybaritic, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 855 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
- Kidwell v. Sybaritic, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 855 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
- GRUNDTNER v. University of Minnesota 730 N.W.2d 323 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- GRUNDTNER v. University of Minnesota 730 N.W.2d 323 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- Minnwest Bank Central v. Flagship Properties LLC 689 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
-
Minnwest Bank Central v. Flagship Properties LLC
689 N.W.2d 295
Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Co., aff'd, (holding that letter from employer candidly addressing concerns about employee’s job performance lacked evidence of malice).
- Bebo v. Delander 632 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
-
Bebo v. Delander
632 N.W.2d 732
Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Co., (reassignment does not constitute interference with at-will contract), aff'd
- Wallin v. Minnesota Department of Corrections 598 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
Wallin v. Minnesota Department of Corrections
598 N.W.2d 393
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Co., (affirming summary judgment).
- Donahue v. Schwegman, Lundberg, Woessner & Kluth, P.A. 586 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-
Donahue v. Schwegman, Lundberg, Woessner & Kluth, P.A.
586 N.W.2d 811
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Co., (characterizing employee’s “report” as feedback which was insufficient to establish retaliatory discharge claim), aff'd.
- Rothmeier v. Investment Advisers, Inc. 556 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
-
Rothmeier v. Investment Advisers, Inc.
556 N.W.2d 590
Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Co., (holding that appellant failed to state a claim of retaliatory discharge where the record showed he merely gave his supervisor feedback and did not report alleged violations to any outside authority), ajfd
- Brown v. Tonka Corp. 519 N.W.2d 474 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Brown v. Tonka Corp. 519 N.W.2d 474 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- Oak Park Development Co. v. Snyder Bros. of Minnesota, Inc. 499 N.W.2d 500 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- Oak Park Development Co. v. Snyder Bros. of Minnesota, Inc. 499 N.W.2d 500 Minn. Ct. App. 1993