Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Koskela, 536 N.W.2d 625.
- State v. Reese 692 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 2005
- Koskela v. State 690 N.W.2d 133 Minn. 2004
- Koskela v. State 690 N.W.2d 133 Minn. 2004
- In re the Welfare of C.M.A. 671 N.W.2d 597 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- In Re CMA 671 N.W.2d 597 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-
In Re CMA
671 N.W.2d 597
Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(rejecting defendant's claim, on appeal from conviction, that his statements to others were insufficient to sustain his conviction for burglary); M.D.S., d at 735 (rejecting defendant's argument on appeal from conviction that state produced insufficient independent evidence of crime so as to
-
In re the Welfare of C.M.A.
671 N.W.2d 597
Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(rejecting defendant’s claim, on appeal from conviction, that his statements to others were insufficient to sustain his conviction for burglary); M.D.S., d at 735 (rejecting defendant’s argument on appeal from conviction that state produced insufficient independent evidence of crime so as to
- State v. DeShay 669 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 2003
- State v. Lopez-Rios 669 N.W.2d 603 Minn. 2003
- State v. DeShay 669 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 2003
- State v. Burg 633 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Burg 633 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Vue 606 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- State v. Vue 606 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- State v. Nystrom 596 N.W.2d 256 Minn. 1999
- State v. Nystrom 596 N.W.2d 256 Minn. 1999
- State v. Wolf 592 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- State v. Wolf 592 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- State v. Greenleaf 591 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1999
- State v. Greenleaf 591 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1999
- State v. Miles 585 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1998
- State v. Miles 585 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1998
- State v. Griller 583 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 1998
- State v. Griller 583 N.W.2d 736 Minn. 1998
- State v. Ferguson 581 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1998
-
State v. Ferguson
581 N.W.2d 824
Minn. 1998
“[T]he credibility of a witness is for the jury to decide.”
- State v. Riley 568 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1997
-
State v. Riley
568 N.W.2d 518
Minn. 1997
The “[a]dmission of an expert’s opinion testimony generally rests within the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be reversed unless there is clear error.”
- In Re Linehan 544 N.W.2d 308 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
-
In Re Linehan
544 N.W.2d 308
Minn. Ct. App. 1996
146 , 130 L.Ed.2d 86 (1994) (reviewing a criminal conviction for proof beyond a reasonable doubt).
- Bixler v. State 582 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 1988
- Bixler v. State 582 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 1988