Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co., 559 N.W.2d 411.
- Smith Jadin Johnson, PLLC, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- Raymond Kvalvog, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- James A. Hoffman, M.D., et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- Minnesota Sporting Clays Association, a Minnesota Nonprofit Corporation, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- North Star Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- Hayley Elizabeth Kytta, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-
Hugh Alan Kantrud, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Co. , d 411, 415 (Minn. 1997) .
-
Nicholas Johnson and Michelle Johnson, individually and as parents and natural guardians of D.J., a minor, Appellants,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Co., (“In determining the existence of [a duty to defend], a court will compare the allegations in the complaint in the underlying action with the relevant language in the insurance policy.”); see also Wooddale Builders, Inc. v. Maryland Cas.
- State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
- Christine Dittel v. Farmers Insurance Exchange Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Christine Dittel v. Farmers Insurance Exchange Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Estate of Gladys I. Norby v. Waseca Mutual Insurance Company n/k/a Austin Mutual Insurance Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Estate of Gladys I. Norby v. Waseca Mutual Insurance Company n/k/a Austin Mutual Insurance Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Remodeling Dimensions, Inc. v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co. 819 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 2012
- Remodeling Dimensions, Inc. v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co. 819 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 2012
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Earthsoils, Inc. 812 N.W.2d 873 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Earthsoils, Inc. 812 N.W.2d 873 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
- Cargill, Inc. v. Ace American Insurance Co. 784 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 2010
- Cargill, Inc. v. Ace American Insurance Co. 784 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 2010
- SECURA Supreme Insurance Company v. MSM 755 N.W.2d 320 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
SECURA Supreme Insurance Company v. MSM
755 N.W.2d 320
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Co., (“Typically, this court has defined the words ‘arising out of in an insurance policy to mean ‘causally connected with’ and not ‘proximately caused by.’ ”); review denied (Minn. Oct.
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. A.P.I., Inc. 738 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
-
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. A.P.I., Inc.
738 N.W.2d 401
Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Co., -19 (Minn.1997) (comparing allegations of complaint against insured to language of insurance contract and assessing whether claims state cause of action within coverage afforded by policy); Milbank Ins.
- Wooddale Builders, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co. 722 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 2006
- Wooddale Builders, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co. 722 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 2006
- Northwestern National Insurance Co. v. Carlson 711 N.W.2d 821 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
- Northwestern National Insurance Co. v. Carlson 711 N.W.2d 821 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
- Home Insurance Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance of Pittsburgh 643 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
-
Home Insurance Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance of Pittsburgh
643 N.W.2d 307
Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Co., (duty to defend all claims arguably covered until completely extinguished).
- Reinsurance Ass'n of Minnesota v. Timmer 641 N.W.2d 302 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
-
Reinsurance Ass'n of Minnesota v. Timmer
641 N.W.2d 302
Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Co., (emphasis omitted) (citations omitted).
- Thommes v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. 622 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- Thommes v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co. 622 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- Fallon McElligott, Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co. 607 N.W.2d 801 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Fallon McElligott, Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co. 607 N.W.2d 801 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co. v. Dahlberg, Inc. 596 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co. v. Dahlberg, Inc.
596 N.W.2d 674
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Co., (noting that, in assessing whether insurer has duty to defend, court must focus on claim); F. Malcolm Cunningham, Jr. & Amy L. Fischer, Insurance Coverage In Construction — The Unanswered Question, 33 Tort & Ins.
- Amos Ex Rel. Amos v. Campbell 593 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
Amos Ex Rel. Amos v. Campbell
593 N.W.2d 263
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Co., (quoting Faber v. Roelofs, 311 Minn. 428, 437 , ).
- Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. & Affiliates v. Miller 589 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 1999
-
Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. & Affiliates v. Miller
589 N.W.2d 297
Minn. 1999
Co., (stating that the language used in insurance contracts must be given its plain and ordinary meaning).
- Gopher Oil Co. v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co. 588 N.W.2d 756 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
Gopher Oil Co. v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co.
588 N.W.2d 756
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Co., (insurer’s duty to defend claims arguably within coverage extends until no basis for indemnification).
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co v. Seagate Technology, Inc. 570 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co v. Seagate Technology, Inc.
570 N.W.2d 503
Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Co., Inc., (citing Inland Constr.