Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Cohen v. Little Six, Inc., 561 N.W.2d 889.

21 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Atravius Joseph Weeks Minn. 2025
Taylor v. Louisiana, 419 U.S. 522, 530 (1975)
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Welfare of: J.A.D., Child (A24-0317), State of Minnesota v. Patrick Junior Jordan, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
This court has similarly recognized that “[w]hile Public Law 280 applies to actions involving ‘Indians,’ this grant of jurisdiction does not apply to Indian tribes, thus preserving the vitality of Indian sovereignty[.]” Cohen v. Little Six, Inc., (emphasis in original), aff’d, (“Public Law 280 certainly does not constitute a governing Act of Congress which validates .
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Hennepin County v. Perry
State of Minnesota v. Robert Earl Boyce Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
But “[t]he Sixth Amendment does not guarantee a criminal defendant a jury of a particular composition or one that mirrors the community.” (explaining that the fair-cross-section-of-the-community requirement is limited and does not guarantee a defendant will receive a jury of a particular racial composition or one that mirrors the racial makeup of the community).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- 98 (Minn. 1997) (Page, J., concurring).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Renard Rucker Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Minnesota courts are committed “to insuring that the systems used are increasingly inclusive in the hope that the faces of the people in the jury room will soon mirror the faces of the people in the community at large.” (quotation omitted); ).
State of Minnesota v. Vilaysack Sirimanothay Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In Re GUARDIANSHIP and CONSERVATORSHIP OF Helen Louise DURAND, Ward/Protected Person 859 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 2015
v. Perry, n.7 (Minn. 1997)).
State v. Griffin 846 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
v. Perry, -97 (Minn.1997); -44 (Minn.1994).
State v. Fairbanks 842 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 2014
Francis v. State 829 N.W.2d 415 Minn. 2013
Greene v. Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Services 755 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 2008
If strict scrutiny applies, the classification must be “narrowly tailored and reasonably necessary to further a compelling governmental interest.” , 897 n. 7 (Minn.1997).
Perry v. State 753 N.W.2d 664 Minn. 2008
Buggs v. State 734 N.W.2d 272 Minn. 2007
(discussing the grand jury selection process used in Hennepin County); (discussing the petit jury selection process used in Hennepin County).
Perry v. State 731 N.W.2d 143 Minn. 2007
McKenzie v. State 707 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 2005
Perry v. State 705 N.W.2d 572 Minn. 2005
State v. Moua 678 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 2004
613(b)); (holding that a statement to police officers was not hearsay when it was elicited to rebut defense counsel’s suggestion that police officers lied to defendant during his interview); (concluding declarants statement was not hearsay because it was not off

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by