Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Borchert v. Maloney, 581 N.W.2d 838.

69 citing documents.

COMMANDEUR LLC v. Howard Hartry, Inc. 724 N.W.2d 508 Minn. 2006
Our holding is at odds with the advisory committee comments to Rule 6.01; however, as we have noted, advisory “committee comments are included for convenience and are not binding on the court.” , 840 & n. 9 (Minn.1998).
Rush v. Jostock 710 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Rush v. Jostock 710 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Appellant’s to support her argument that respondents did not comply with rule 68 requirements is misplaced, although Borchert does lend persuasive support for appellant’s argument that she was the prevailing party in this case and is, therefore, entitled to recover her costs and disbursements.
Wilson v. Commissioner of Revenue 707 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 2006
Wilson v. Commissioner of Revenue 707 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 2006
We have explained that “[t]he prevailing party in any action is one in whose favor the decision or verdict is rendered and judgment entered.”
Posey v. Fossen 707 N.W.2d 712 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Posey v. Fossen 707 N.W.2d 712 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Vandenheuvel v. Wagner 690 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 2005
Vandenheuvel v. Wagner 690 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 2005
(recognizing that Minnesota allows the offeree to recover costs as a prevailing party under Minn.Stat.
Vandenheuvel v. Wagner 673 N.W.2d 524 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Vandenheuvel v. Wagner 673 N.W.2d 524 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Collins v. Minnesota School of Business, Inc. 636 N.W.2d 816 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Collins v. Minnesota School of Business, Inc. 636 N.W.2d 816 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
See Minn. Stat. §§ 549.02 ,.04 (2000) (providing that prevailing party in lawsuit is entitled to recover costs and disbursements from non-prevailing party); (holding that for purposes of determining entitlement to award of costs and disbursements, “[t]he prevailing party in any action is one in whose favor the decision or verdict is rendered and judgment entered.”); Quade & Sons Refrigeration, Inc. v. Minn. Mining & Mfg.
Luna v. Zeeb 633 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Luna v. Zeeb 633 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
as the controlling authority.
Shepherd of the Valley Lutheran Church of Hastings v. Hope Lutheran Church of Hastings 626 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Shepherd of the Valley Lutheran Church of Hastings v. Hope Lutheran Church of Hastings 626 N.W.2d 436 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Stanbury 614 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 2000
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Stanbury 614 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 2000
(holding that prevailing party pursuant to Minn.Stat.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by