Cited by

In making that determination, “‘the general result should be considered, and inquiry made as to who has, in the view of the law, succeeded in the action.’” ().

(“The prevailing party in any action is one in whose favor the decision or verdict is rendered and judgment entered .”).

It remains for this court to construe and apply the rules.” n.9 (Minn. 1998).

“The prevailing party in any action is one in whose favor the decision or verdict is rendered and judgment entered.”

To determine the prevailing party, the district court considers “who has, in the view of the law, succeeded in the action.” ().

“Prevail” is defined as “[t]o obtain the relief sought in an action” or “to win a lawsuit.” Black’s Law Dictionary 1438 (11th ed. 2019); (interpreting the phrase “prevailing party” as used in chapter 549 as “one in whose favor the decision or verdict is rendered and judgment entered”).

When identifying the prevailing party, “the general result should be considered, and inquiry made as to who has, in the view of the law, succeeded in the action.” Borchert v. Maloney , (quotation omitted).

” Borchert v. Maloney , see also Posey v. Fossen , (noting that where more than one party succeeds in part, determining which party prevailed involves “a careful weighing of the relativ e success of the parties to a lawsuit”) ; Benigni v. C ounty of St.

“The prevailing party in any action is the one in whose favor the decision or verdict is rendered and judgment entered.” .

d 838, 840 (Minn. 1998) (noting that to determine the prevailing party, “ the general result should be considered, and inquiry made as to who has, in the view of the law, succeeded in the action” (quotation omitted)).

See, e.g. , Borchet v. Maloney , ( noting that, “[t]he prevailing party in any action is one in whose favor the decision or verdict is rendered and judgment entered.”).

When determining the prevailing party, “the general result should be considered, and inquiry made as to who has, in the view of the law, succeeded in the action.” (quotation omitted).

When determining the prevailing party, “the general result should be considered, and inquiry made as to who has, in the view 26 of the law, succeeded in the action.” (quotation omitted).

The Minnesota Supreme Court recognizes that the phrase “prevailing party” has acquired a special meaning as one “wh o has, in the view of the law, succeeded in the action,” in that he or she is the party ‘‘in whose favor the decision or verdict is rendered and judgment entered.” (quotation omitted).

“The prevailing party in any action is one in whose favor the decision or verdict is rendered and judgment entered.” Borchert v. Maloney

Bedasso argues for a different result, d 838 (Minn. 1998).

The prevailing party in any action is one in whose favor the decision or verdict is rendered and judgment entered.” d 838, 840 (Minn. 1998) (quotation omitted).

Although not binding, see Borchert v. Maloney , , 840 (Minn. 1998), the advisory committee comments to the 2008 amendments to rule 68 support our interpretation.

When determining the prevailing party, “the general result should be considered, and inquiry made as to who has, in the view of the law, succeeded in the action.” (quotation omitted).

“The prevailing party in any action is one in whose favor the decision or verdict is rendered and judgment entered.” Borchert v. Maloney

“The prevailing party in any action is one in whose favor the decision or verdict is rendered and judgment entered.” Borchert v. Maloney , see Elsenpeter v. St.

“The prevailing party in any action is one in whose favor the decision or verdict is rendered and judgment entered.”

“The prevailing party in any action is one in whose favor the decision or verdict is rendered and judgment entered.” Borchert v. Maloney

“In determining who qualifies as the prevailing party in an action, the general result should be considered, and inquiry made as to who has, in the view of the law, succeeded in the action.” (quotation omitted).

“The prevailing party in any action is one in whose favor the decision or verdict is rendered and judgment entered.”

“In determining who qualifies as the prevailing party in an action, the general result should be considered, and inquiry made as to who has, in the view of the law, succeeded 3 in the action.” (quotation omitted).

d 838, 840 (Minn. 1998) (applying general costs-and-disbursements statute and rejecting argument that defendant was prevailing party when final judgment was in favor of plaintiff but amount of judgment was less than settlement offer by defendant); Elsenpeter v. St.

“In determining who qualifies as the prevailing party in an action, the general result should be considered, and inquiry made as to who has, in the view of the law, succeeded in the action.” (quotation omitted).

Tenant argues that, while the statute requires the tenant to “prevail,” the statute does not require the tenant to be the “prevailing party.” “The prevailing party in any action is one in whose favor the decision or verdict is rendered and judgment entered.” (quotation omitted).

“In determining who qualifies as the prevailing party in an action, the general result should be considered, and inquiry made as to who has, in the view of the law, succeeded in the action.” (quotation omitted).

“The prevailing party in any action is one in whose favor the decision or verdict is rendered and judgment entered.”

The prevailing party in any action is one in whose favor the decision or verdict is rendered and judgment entered.” (quotation omitted).

“In determining who qualifies as the prevailing party in an action, the general result should be considered, and inquiry made as to who has, in the view of the law, succeeded in the action.” (quotation omitted).