Cited by

Planning activity may include “prior possession of the murder weapon, surreptitious approach of the victim, or taking the prospective victim to a place where others are unlikely to intrude.” Moore, d at 361 (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted); (flnding premeditation when the defendant followed the victim to a place where he knew she would be alone before shooting her).

250 n. 2 (Minn.1999) (noting that whether a defendant has met his burden so as to be entitled to a jury instruction on involuntary intoxication and wheth *856 er the defendant has met his burden of proving the elements of the defense before the trier of fact “are two separate inquiries”).

(“What evidence to present to the jury, including which defenses to raise at trial and what witnesses to call, represent an attorney’s decision regarding trial tactics which lie within the proper discretion of trial counsel and will not be reviewed later for competence.”).

Planning activity may include “ ‘prior possession of the murder weapon, surreptitious approach of the victim, or taking the prospective victim to a place where others are unlikely to intrude.’ ” Moore, d at 361 (quoting Wayne R. LaFave & Austin W. Scott Jr., Handbook on Criminal Law § 73, at 564-65 (1972)); (finding premeditation when the defendant followed the victim to a place where he knew she would be alone before shooting her); (finding evidence of premeditation when, the defendant drov

“What evidence to present to the jury, including which defenses to raise at trial and what witnesses to call, represent an attorney’s decision regarding trial tactics which lie within the proper discretion of trial counsel and will not be reviewed later for competence.”

See, -12 (Minn.2003) (bringing loaded rifle to estranged wife’s house, driving around the block so as not to be seen by the neighbor, and taking off shoes to walk up stairs supported inference of premeditation); -48, 253 (Minn.1999) (bringing rifle to estranged wife’s place of work, parking a street away, and waiting in the dark for her to come outside supported inference of premeditation); Moore, d at 361-62 (removing shotgun from normal storage under the bed, loading it, and plac *423 ing it o

State v. Voorhees (Voorhees I)

Planning activity includes “prior possession of the murder weapon by the defendant, surreptitious approach of the victim, or taking the victim to a place where others are unlikely to intrude.” Id.; see, -48, 253 (Minn.1999) (stating that bringing rifle to estranged wife’s place of work and quietly approaching her when she went outside to smoke supported inference of premeditation); Moore, d at 361-62 (concluding that removing shotgun from normal storage under the bed, loading it, and placing it

See, -48, 253 (Minn.1999) (bringing rifle to estranged wife’s place of work and approaching her when she went outside to smoke supported inference of premeditation); Moore, d at 361-62 (removing shotgun from storage under bed, loading it, and placing it on living room shelf before the killing showed planning).

Id.; see, -48, 253 (Minn.1999) (bringing rifle to estranged wife’s place of work and quietly approaching her when she went outside to smoke supported inference of premeditation); Moore, d at 361-62 (removing shotgun from normal storage under the bed, loading it, and placing it on the shelf in the living room before

See, e.g., Boitnott, d at 370-71 (failure to investigate, prepare for trial, and raise timely objections); (defenses raised at trial); (which witnesses are called and what information is presented to the jury).

(“What evidence to present to the jury, including which defense to raise at trial and what witnesses to call, represent an attorney’s decision regarding trial tactics which lie within the proper discretion of trial counsel and will not be reviewed later for competence.”); see Brocks, d at 43