Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Witzman v. Lehrman, Lehrman & Flom, 601 N.W.2d 179.

21 citing documents.

John Donahue, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
” Witzman v. Lehrman, Lehrman & Flom
Cheryl M. Shega, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
13 its claim, the estate relies on Witzman v. Lehrman, Lehrman & Flom , where the supreme court held that, “at least in some circumstances, Minnesota law does recognize a claim based on aiding and abetting the tortious conduct of another.”
A23-0268 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Witzman v. Lehrman, Lehrman & Flom
RSS Fridley, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Witzman v. Lehrman, Lehrman & Flom , -86 (Minn. 1999).
Proactive Imaging, LLC d/b/a Minnesota Radiology, Plaintiff, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
8 Witzman v. Lehrma n, Lehrman & Flom , (emphasis added).
Dusenbery v. Hawks 895 N.W.2d 640 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Dusenbery v. Hawks 895 N.W.2d 640 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord’s, Inc., (outlining elements of fraudulent inducement claim, including showing of “pecuniary *647 damages”); Witzman v. Lehrman, Lehrman & Flom, -86 (Minn. 1999) (“[A]ll who actively participate in any manner in the commission of a tort, or who ...
Minotto v. Van Cott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
CSM Equities, LLC v. Woodland Village Investments Limited Partnership Minn. Ct. App. 2016
CSM Equities, LLC v. Woodland Village Investments Limited Partnership Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Witzman v. Lehrman, Lehrman & Flom
Elfi E. Janssen v. Lommen, Abdo, Cole, King & Stageberg, P. A., Sibley Holdings, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Elfi E. Janssen v. Lommen, Abdo, Cole, King & Stageberg, P. A., Sibley Holdings, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
We therefore “narrowly and strictly interpret the elements” of conspiracy, collusion, and aiding-and-abetting claims against professionals in order to “preclude meritless claims.” See Witzman v. Lehrman, Lehrman & Flom, -87 (Minn. 1999).
Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A", Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. CVS Caremark Corporation, Appellants/Cross-Respondents, Coborn's Incorporated, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, … 850 N.W.2d 682 Minn. 2014
Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A", Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. CVS Caremark Corporation, Appellants/Cross-Respondents, Coborn's Incorporated, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, … 850 N.W.2d 682 Minn. 2014
Our jurisprudence with respect to omission- based claims reflects the common law principle that for an omission to be actionable, it must be material to the transaction, U.S. Bank N.A., d at 373, and the party concealing the fact must have been under a legal or equitable obligation to communicate the fact to the other party, Witzman v. Lehrman, Lehrman & Flom, Richfield Bank & Trust Co. v. Sjogren, 309 Minn. 362, 366, d 648, 650 (1976).
Matthews v. Eichorn Motors, Inc. 800 N.W.2d 823 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Matthews v. Eichorn Motors, Inc. 800 N.W.2d 823 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
See Witzman v. Lehrman, Lehrman & Flom, (applying Restatement (Second) of Torts legal standard to claim alleging that ac-eountants aided clients in breaching fiduciary duties).
Greer v. Professional Fiduciary, Inc. 792 N.W.2d 120 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Greer v. Professional Fiduciary, Inc. 792 N.W.2d 120 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Also at oral argument, Greer’s counsel withdrew arguments based on Restatement (Third) of the Law Governing Lawyers § 51 (2000), which addresses the relationship between a guardian’s attorney and the ward, and Witzman v. Lehman, Lehman, & Flom, which addresses an attorney's liability for a client's torts.
Federico v. MARIC 226 P.3d 403 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust Fund 38 P.3d 12 Ariz. 2002
Wells Fargo Bank v. Az Laborers Ariz. 2002

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by