Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Dukes v. State, 621 N.W.2d 246.

225 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
To support this argument, Behrens relies on Dukes v. State, where the supreme court acknowledged that “there are some Sixth Amendment right to counsel violations in which prejudice to the defendant will be presumed.” (citing Strickland 466 U.S. at 692, 104 S. Ct. 2052).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
An attorney provides reasonable assistance “ upon exercising the customary skills and diligence that a reasonably competent attorney would exercise under the circumstances.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Seth Clayton Francis Crawford v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Seth Clayton Francis Crawford v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Arthur Anthony Torgesen Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Arthur Anthony Torgesen Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Brett Thomas Green v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Brett Thomas Green v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Although the four-prong Rainer test is the correct test for newly-discovered evidence, it is not the correct test when a court reviews an allegation that false testimony was given at trial.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J.M.B., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J.M.B., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Steven Kobena Ampah Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Steven Kobena Ampah Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. M. C., T. D. R., and A. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ronald David Olson 884 N.W.2d 906 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. M. C., T. D. R., and A. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ronald David Olson 884 N.W.2d 906 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
d 246, 252 (Minn. 2001).
Patrick Samuel Meszaros v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ernest Alvin Ranzy Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ernest Alvin Ranzy Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Patrick Samuel Meszaros v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Wayne Deante Akis v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Wayne Deante Akis v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Monda Thao v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Monda Thao v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
d 246, 252 (Minn. 2001).
Jamel Daniel Hoard v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jamel Daniel Hoard v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
d 246, 252 (Minn. 2001).
State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Bruce Cournoyer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Bruce Cournoyer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
F. The district court’s adoption of the state’s proposed findings A district “court’s verbatim adoption of the state’s proposed findings, standing alone, does not constitute grounds for reversal.”
State of Minnesota v. Dustin James Wallin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Dustin James Wallin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-53 (Minn. 2001) (remanding for new trial when defense counsel acknowledged defendant’s guilt to aiding and abetting attempted aggravated robbery in attempt to avoid first-degree murder conviction); (granting new trial when defendant testified that he accidentally
Mackenzie Leigh Meier v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Mackenzie Leigh Meier v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
d 246, 252 (Minn. 2001).
State of Minnesota v. Richard Lee Cunningham Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Richard Lee Cunningham Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sara Elaine Katra v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sara Elaine Katra v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Eduardo Cortez, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Eduardo Cortez, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jose Manuel Ortiz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jose Manuel Ortiz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“[A]n attorney acts within the objective standard of reasonableness when he provides his client with the representation of an attorney exercising the customary skills and diligence that a reasonably competent attorney would perform under the circumstances.” (quotation omitted).
Chaun Dubae Carridine v. State of Minnesota 867 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 2015
Chaun Dubae Carridine v. State of Minnesota 867 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Justin Michael Fenney Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Justin Michael Fenney Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Lincoln Lamar Caldwell v. State of Minnesota 853 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 2014
Lincoln Lamar Caldwell v. State of Minnesota 853 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 2014
‘when a court reviews an allegation that false testimony was given at trial’ ” ()).
State v. Beane 840 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Beane 840 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 2013