Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Krosch, 642 N.W.2d 713.

174 citing documents.

Laura Kay Ellingsworth, Hennepin County v. Moses Wazwaz Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. David Alan Nielsen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. David Alan Nielsen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(stating that appellate courts will not consider claims set out in a pro se supplemental brief that include “no argument or citation to legal authority in support of the allegations”); see also Louden v. Louden, 221 Minn. 338, 339, (“An assignment of error based on mere
State of Minnesota v. Earl Eugene Ashmore Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Earl Eugene Ashmore Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(deeming allegations unsupported by argument or authority to be waived).
State of Minnesota v. Jesse B. Bennett Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Jesse B. Bennett Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(holding that if the brief does not contain an argument or citation to legal authority in support of the allegation raised, the allegation is deemed waived).
State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Bruce Cournoyer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Bruce Cournoyer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(deeming 10 arguments set out in pro se supplemental brief waived because the “brief contain[ed] no argument or citation to legal authority in support of the allegations”).
State of Minnesota v. Gregory Lawrence Gerads Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Gregory Lawrence Gerads Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Kemen Lavatos Taylor, II 869 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Kemen Lavatos Taylor, II 869 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2015
We deem arguments waived on appeal if a pro se supplemental brief “contains no argument or citation to legal authority in support of the allegations.” State v. Krosch
State of Minnesota v. Richard John McNeil Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Joseph Knebel Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Joseph Knebel Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(deeming arguments set out in pro se supplemental brief waived because “brief contain[ed] no argument or citation to legal authority in support of the allegations”); (stating that assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported
State of Minnesota v. Richard John McNeil Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(concluding that arguments raised in pro se supplemental brief would not be considered because the “brief contain[ed] no argument or citation to legal authority in support of the allegations”); (stating that appellant’s allegation
State of Minnesota v. Ali Mehralian Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ali Mehralian Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- 20 (Minn. 2002) (deeming issue raised in pro se brief as waived when appellant failed to provide legal or factual support for argument).
State of Minnesota v. Tabashish Anamiki Ogitchida Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Tabashish Anamiki Ogitchida Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(concluding that arguments set out in pro se supplemental brief would not be considered because the “brief contain[ed] no argument or citation to legal authority in support of the allegations”); (stating that assignment of error based on mer
State of Minnesota v. Leland Ronald Nelson, II Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Leland Ronald Nelson, II Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(holding that a pro se claim without argument is deemed waived).
State of Minnesota v. Francisco Cleofus Mountain Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Dane Joseph Riley Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Dane Joseph Riley Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-20 (Minn. 2002) (deeming issue raised in pro se brief as waived when appellant failed to provide legal or factual support for argument).
State of Minnesota v. Francisco Cleofus Mountain Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(deeming arguments set out in pro se supplemental brief waived because “brief contain[ed] no argument or citation to legal 13 authority in support of the allegations”); (stating that assignment of
In re the Marriage of: Anthony Linus Orner v. Shauna Orner Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Anthony Linus Orner v. Shauna Orner Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Roxanne Kay DeFlorin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Roxanne Kay DeFlorin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(concluding that argument was waived when a “brief contain[ed] no argument or citation to legal authority in support of the allegations”).
Jason Donald Matakis v. State of Minnesota 862 N.W.2d 33 Minn. 2015
Jason Donald Matakis v. State of Minnesota 862 N.W.2d 33 Minn. 2015
unsupported by either arguments or citations to legal authority”); , 446 n. 6 (Minn.2006) (dismissing a catchall claim because it lacked factual support); , 448 n. 1 (Minn.2005) (refusing to consider ineffective assistance claims because the allegations were mere argumentative assertions without factual support); (deeming allegations waived when the brief contained "no argument or citation to legal authority in support of the allegations”).
Joshua Zachary Matter v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Joshua Zachary Matter v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(holding that appellant waived ineffective assistance of trial counsel claims by failing to include in the appellate brief “argument or citation to legal authority in support of the allegations” and prejudicial error was not obvious); (stating that when a party makes no argument and cites no legal authority to support a claim, appellate court deems it waived).
State of Minnesota v. Jesse Keith Fultz Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jesse Keith Fultz Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Basil Benna Dudley Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Basil Benna Dudley Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“Assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by argument or authority is waived unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection.” (quotation omitted); see also State v. 6 Krosch, (stating that claims in a pro se supplemental brief are waived if the brief contains no argument or citation to legal authority supporting the claims).
State of Minnesota v. Keith Richard Rossberg 851 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Keith Richard Rossberg 851 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2014
We treat such unsupported claims as waived and do not consider them “unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection.” Kaehler v. Kaehler, 219 Minn. 536, 537, accord
State v. A.S.E. 835 N.W.2d 513 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. A.S.E. 835 N.W.2d 513 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Hawkinson 829 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 2013
State v. Hawkinson 829 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 2013
In pressing his due process arguments
Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. Partnership 811 N.W.2d 596 Minn. 2012
Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. Partnership 811 N.W.2d 596 Minn. 2012
(finding that argument was waived when a "brief contained] no argument or citation to legal authority in support of the allegations”).
Inquiry into the Conduct of Karasov 805 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 2011
Inquiry into the Conduct of Karasov 805 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 2011
(finding that argument was waived when a "brief contained] no argument or citation to legal authority in support of the allegations”).
State v. Palmer 803 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 2011

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by