Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Krosch, 642 N.W.2d 713.

174 citing documents.

  • State v. Palmer 803 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 2011
  • State v. Nissalke 801 N.W.2d 82 Minn. 2011
  • State v. Nissalke 801 N.W.2d 82 Minn. 2011
  • State v. Jenkins 782 N.W.2d 211 Minn. 2010
  • State v. Jenkins 782 N.W.2d 211 Minn. 2010
    (citing Arizona v. Young-blood, 488 U.S. 61 , 56-58, 109 S.Ct.
  • State v. Brown 758 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • State v. Brown 758 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • State v. Bartylla 755 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 2008
  • State v. Bartylla 755 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 2008
    (deeming arguments set out in the defendant’s pro se supplemental brief waived because “[t]he brief eontain[ed] no argument or citation to legal authority in support of the allega *23 tions”); see also Louden v. Louden, 221 Minn. 338, 339 , (“An assignment of error based on m
  • State v. Engle 731 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
  • State v. Engle 731 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
    As a unanimous supreme court emphasized, the reason a due-process violation does not arise from evidence that the state never possessed “is obvious, as it would be illogical to impose an obligation on the state to preserve evidence that it does not possess.”
  • State v. Washington 725 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
  • State v. Washington 725 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
    (finding waiver of issues not supported by argument or authority).
  • State v. Meldrum 724 N.W.2d 15 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
  • State v. Meldrum 724 N.W.2d 15 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
  • State v. Moon 717 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
  • State v. Moon 717 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
    (noting that claims unsupported by legal authority are deemed waived).
  • State v. Eibensteiner 690 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Eibensteiner 690 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Hanf 687 N.W.2d 659 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Hanf 687 N.W.2d 659 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    (holding that issues not supported by argument or citation to legal authority were deemed waived).
  • State v. Manley 664 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 2003
  • State v. Manley 664 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 2003
  • State v. Larivee 656 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 2003