Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Langeslag v. KYMN Inc., 664 N.W.2d 860.

31 citing documents.

A25-0341 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Denial of a motion for JMOL must be affirmed “if, in considering the evidence in the record in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, there is any competent evidence reasonably tending to sustain the verdict.” d 860, 864 (Minn. 2003) (quotations omitted).2 The MHRA provides that an employer’s decision to discharge an employee is an unfair employment practice if the decision is because of the employee’s disability.
Jhonathan J. Robinson v. Robert R. Amos Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Jhonathan J. Robinson v. Robert R. Amos Minn. Ct. App. 2024
The elements of an IIED claim are as follows: “(1) the conduct must be extreme and outrageous; (2) the conduct must be intentional or reckless; (3) it must cause emotional distress; and (4) the distress must be severe.” (quotation omitted).
Corey Pearson v. St. Cloud Hospital, Emergency Physicians Professional Association, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Corey Pearson v. St. Cloud Hospital, Emergency Physicians Professional Association, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-65 (Minn. 2003) (“We have cautioned that intentional infliction of emotional distress is sharply limited to cases involving particularly egregious facts and that a high threshold standard of proof is required to submit the claim to a jury.” (quotations omitted)); see also Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc., 330
Chase Rovere v. Clifford Ling Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Chase Rovere v. Clifford Ling Minn. Ct. App. 2024
14 distress; and (4) the distress must be severe.” (quoting Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc., -39 (Minn. 1983)).
Susan Carol Sohn, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
11 reports about an individual, shouting at them, using vulgar language, and invading their personal space do not rise to the level of outrage that is “utterly intolerable to the civilized community.” 868 (Minn. 2003) (quoting Hubbard, d at 439).
Jeremy D. Mount, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Langeslag v. KYMN Inc ., (determining that inconclusive medical records could not support the alleged cause of a party’s emotional distress where there was medical i ssues from multiple sources).
Samuel Zean, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Fr. William Graham, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(recognizing an individual’s right to bring a nonfrivolous lawsuit under Minnesota’s constitution).
Samuel Zean, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
An IIED claim has four elements: “(1) the conduct must be extreme and outrageous; (2) the conduct must be intentional or reckless; (3) it must cause emotional distress; and (4) the distress must be severe.” Langeslag v. KYMN Inc. , (quotation omitted).
Roy A. Day on behalf of himself and as class action on behalf of others similarly situated, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Langeslag v. KYMN, Inc., d 860, 864 (Minn. 2003).
Teresa McDonald v. Allina Health System d/b/a United Hospital Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Teresa McDonald v. Allina Health System d/b/a United Hospital Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Count 11: Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED) The elements of an IIED claim are: “(1) the conduct must be extreme and outrageous; (2) the conduct must be intentional or reckless; (3) it must cause emotional distress; and (4) the distress must be severe.” (quotation omitted).
R. Wynn Kearney, Jr., M.D. v. The Orthopaedic and Fracture Clinic, P.A. v. Steven B. Curtis, intervening and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
R. Wynn Kearney, Jr., M.D. v. The Orthopaedic and Fracture Clinic, P.A. v. Steven B. Curtis, intervening and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
IIED has four elements: “(1) the conduct must be extreme and outrageous; (2) the conduct must be intentional or reckless; (3) it must cause emotional distress; and (4) the distress must be severe.” (quoting Hubbard v. United Press Int’l, Inc., -39 (Minn. 1983)).
Barbara Peterson v. HealthEast Woodwinds Hospital Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Barbara Peterson v. HealthEast Woodwinds Hospital Minn. Ct. App. 2015
RKL Landholdings, LLC v. Seneca Specialty Insurance Company, 1563 University Ave, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
RKL Landholdings, LLC v. Seneca Specialty Insurance Company, 1563 University Ave, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sean Kennedy v. Soo Line Railroad Company d/b/a Canadian Pacific Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sean Kennedy v. Soo Line Railroad Company d/b/a Canadian Pacific Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of Minnesota 834 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of Minnesota 834 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re the Estate of Butler 803 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 2011
In re the Estate of Butler 803 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 2011
Bahr v. Boise Cascade Corp. 766 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 2009
Bahr v. Boise Cascade Corp. 766 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 2009
See Langeslag v. KYMN, Inc., (stating that motions for judgment as a matter of law are reviewed de novo).
Dunn v. National Beverage Corp. 729 N.W.2d 637 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Dunn v. National Beverage Corp. 729 N.W.2d 637 Minn. Ct. App. 2007