DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Motl, 337 N.W.2d 664.

33 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
  • State v. Lopez 794 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
  • State v. Lopez 794 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
    When reviewing challenges to guilty pleas entered without the benefit of counsel, appellate courts “have been strict.”
  • Vernlund v. State 589 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • Vernlund v. State 589 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
    (“The most dangerous combination which calls for the closest scrutiny of the record is when the defendant does not have an attorney and is given the group advisory * * *.”)
  • State v. Foncesa 505 N.W.2d 370 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Foncesa 505 N.W.2d 370 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
    the Minnesota Supreme Court was confronted with the following individual questioning: THE CLERK: Allen David Motl.
  • State v. Warren 419 N.W.2d 795 Minn. 1988
  • State v. Warren 419 N.W.2d 795 Minn. 1988
    we said, "In general trial courts accepting guilty pleas from misdemeanants should be more specific in their questions, particularly in determining whether the defendant waives his right to counsel and whether there is a factual basis for the plea."
  • State v. Lillemo 410 N.W.2d 66 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Lillemo 410 N.W.2d 66 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Snyder 408 N.W.2d 708 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Snyder 408 N.W.2d 708 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Rubin 404 N.W.2d 13 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Rubin 404 N.W.2d 13 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    The court stated: provides a guide for the sentencing court in determining whether the record of each of the prior proceedings adequately establishes a valid waiver of counsel by the defendant.
  • State v. Sandmoen 390 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Sandmoen 390 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    questions relating to street location and date of the offense as well as results of a blood test were deemed to be among the “absolute bare minimum” acceptable in gross misdemeanor DWI cases.
  • State v. Larsen 384 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Larsen 384 N.W.2d 220 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Edmison 379 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1985
  • State v. Edmison 379 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1985
    provides a guide for the sentencing court in determining whether the record of each of the prior proceedings adequately establishes a valid waiver of counsel by the defendant.
  • State v. Grunewald 378 N.W.2d 55 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Grunewald 378 N.W.2d 55 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Hanson 360 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Stewart 360 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Stewart 360 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    ISSUE Whether, the transcript from the 1982 plea to the misdemeanor D.W.I.
  • State v. Hanson 360 N.W.2d 460 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    in support of its contention that there was a valid waiver of counsel on the record.
  • State v. Brown 346 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Brown 346 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    the Minnesota Supreme Court emphasized the need for clarifying group warnings.
  • State v. Medenwaldt 341 N.W.2d 885 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Medenwaldt 341 N.W.2d 885 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    15.02 and 15.03 with one exception: there was no record of the proceeding as required by 15.03.
  • State v. Simon 339 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Simon 339 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 1983
    where we held that the record establishing the waiver of counsel in connection with the guilty plea to the prior misdemeanor was barely adequate.