Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Green, 351 N.W.2d 42.

27 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(holding that actual receipt of notice is not required to meet due process).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
7(a) (2018); (holding that due process does not require actual receipt of the notice).
State v. Jama 908 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Jama 908 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Green , , 44 (Minn. App. 1984).
David John Anderson v. Commissioner of Public Safety 878 N.W.2d 926 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
David John Anderson v. Commissioner of Public Safety 878 N.W.2d 926 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Actual receipt of the notice is not required to meet the due process requirement.” d 42, 44 (Minn. App. 1984).
In the Matter of the Expulsion of A.D. from United South Central Public Schools No. 2134. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Expulsion of A.D. from United South Central Public Schools No. 2134. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(concluding that “willfully,” as used in child-neglect statute, means “intentional”), review denied (Minn. Feb.
Ogbonna Iwu, Relator v. Minneapolis City Council Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ogbonna Iwu, Relator v. Minneapolis City Council Minn. Ct. App. 2015
be reasonably calculated to reach the intended party.” -44 (Minn. App. 1984).
Mahmood Khan, Relator v. Minneapolis City Council Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Mahmood Khan, Relator v. Minneapolis City Council Minn. Ct. App. 2014
be reasonably calculated to reach the intended party.” -44 (Minn. App. 1984) (citing Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 70 S. Ct. 652 (1949)).
State v. Cifelli 155 P.3d 363 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State v. Rhode 628 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Rhode 628 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
where this court concluded that there was insufficient evidence to show that the defendant had willfully driven after his license was suspended because there was no evidence that he received notice of the suspension.
Resolution Revoking License 000337 West Side Pawn—880 South Robert Street 587 N.W.2d 521 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Resolution Revoking License 000337 West Side Pawn—880 South Robert Street 587 N.W.2d 521 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
“Actual receipt of the notice is not required to meet the due process requirement.”
State v. Schramel 581 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Schramel 581 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
review denied (Minn. June 30, 1987); (“willful” generally means bad purpose or evil intent in statutes involving moral turpitude and in misdemeanor statutes denotes an intentional, as opposed to accidental, act).
State v. Coady 412 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Coady 412 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Wickstrom 405 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Wickstrom 405 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(“wilful” may have a different meaning in misdemeanor statutes).
McShane v. Commissioner of Public Safety 377 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
McShane v. Commissioner of Public Safety 377 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See, e.g., Goldsworthy v. State, Department of Public Safety
State v. McCOLLOR 359 N.W.2d 641 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. McCOLLOR 359 N.W.2d 641 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Compare this situation for instance, where a notice of suspension was mailed to the defendant at an incorrect address, resulting in his conviction of driving after suspension.