Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Speak, 339 N.W.2d 741.

55 citing documents.

R e s p o n d e n t , Minn. 2021
State v. Wood 922 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Wood 922 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Speak , , 744 (Minn. 1983) (interpreting Minn. Stat. § 169.121 , subd.
State of Minnesota v. Adam Blaine Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Adam Blaine Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Earl Alfonso Culver Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Earl Alfonso Culver Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Derek Lawrence Stavish 868 N.W.2d 670 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Derek Lawrence Stavish 868 N.W.2d 670 Minn. 2015
administration of the [blood alcohol] test will result in the discovery of evidence that will aid in the prosecution of that crime” ()).
State of Minnesota v. Tyler Thomas Devries Morse Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Tyler Thomas Devries Morse Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See State v. Koppi, 6 -64 (Minn. 2011) (); -47 (Minn. App. 2001) (stating that an “officer’s subjective good-faith belief” that “criminal activity may be afoot” is not sufficient and the officer “must articulate specific facts” that reasonably justify the stop), review denied (Minn. July 24
State v. Martin 823 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Martin 823 N.W.2d 913 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
(declining to consider matters outside the record on which the grand jury decided to indict that were cited in state’s brief).
State v. Koppi 779 N.W.2d 562 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Koppi 779 N.W.2d 562 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Shriner 751 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 2008
State v. Shriner 751 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 2008
.Ct. 1826 ); , 173 n. 2 (Minn.2004) (describing in dicta that Schmerber and Oevering , “due to the natural exigency involved in obtaining blood-alcohol evidence, recognize the power of a peace officer to compel a blood sample from a driver where there is probable cause to believe the driver has violated a criminal vehicular operation law”); (holding “[ejxigent circumstances were clearly present” that justified warrantless, nonconsensual breathalyzer test where defendant was suspected of fatally
State v. Shriner 739 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Johnson 689 N.W.2d 247 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Johnson 689 N.W.2d 247 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
d test during an investigation of a person for criminal vehicular operation resulting in death is “probable cause to believe that the crime of criminal negligence has been committed and probable cause to believe not that the defendant is intoxicated but that administration of the [blood] test will result in the discovery of evidence that will aid in the prosecution of that crime.”
State v. Lee 585 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1998
State v. Lee 585 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1998
In the leading case following Aguirre, a prosecution for criminal negligence resulting in death, we articulated as follows the kind of probable cause needed: We believe that the probable cause that is needed — assuming that probable cause is needed — is probable cause to believe that the crime of criminal negligence has been committed and prob
State v. Walker 584 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 1998
State v. Walker 584 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 1998
State v. Nielsen 530 N.W.2d 212 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Nielsen 530 N.W.2d 212 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
(finding probable cause that defendant committed criminal negligence and that a breath test will provide evidence to support prosecution from the facts that driver smelled of alcohol, was involved in a fatal accident, and told conflicting stories).
State v. Moorman 505 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1993
State v. Moorman 505 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1993
State v. Schauer 501 N.W.2d 673 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Hanson 501 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Schauer 501 N.W.2d 673 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Thus, police did not have probable cause to arrest Schauer for criminal vehicular operation, -45 (Minn.1983) d at 81 .
State v. Hanson 501 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Condon 497 N.W.2d 272 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Condon 497 N.W.2d 272 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Dittel 464 N.W.2d 601 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Dittel 464 N.W.2d 601 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Storvick 428 N.W.2d 55 Minn. 1988
State v. Storvick 428 N.W.2d 55 Minn. 1988
we said that the probable cause needed for police to conduct a war-rantless nonconsensual blood test in an investigation of a person for criminal vehicular operation resulting in death (“assuming that probable cause is needed”) is “probable cause to believe that the crime of criminal negligence has b
Costillo v. Commissioner of Public Safety 416 N.W.2d 730 Minn. 1987
Costillo v. Commissioner of Public Safety 416 N.W.2d 730 Minn. 1987
Shull v. Commissioner of Public Safety 398 N.W.2d 11 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Shull v. Commissioner of Public Safety 398 N.W.2d 11 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Pittman 395 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Pittman 395 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Feil v. Commissioner of Public Safety 383 N.W.2d 420 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Feil v. Commissioner of Public Safety 383 N.W.2d 420 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Tyler v. Commissioner of Public Safety 368 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1985
State v. DeRose 365 N.W.2d 284 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. DeRose 365 N.W.2d 284 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. DeSart 357 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1984