Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Race, 383 N.W.2d 656.

114 citing documents.

State v. Williams 510 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Williams 510 N.W.2d 252 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Gassler 505 N.W.2d 62 Minn. 1993
State v. Gassler 505 N.W.2d 62 Minn. 1993
Race v. State 504 N.W.2d 214 Minn. 1993
Race v. State 504 N.W.2d 214 Minn. 1993
["Race /”] *216 (Minn. 1987) ["Race II"].
State v. Scharmer 501 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1993
State v. Scharmer 501 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1993
We must ask whether the reasonable inferences legitimately drawn from the circumstantial evidence presented at trial “are consistent with [appellant’s] guilt and inconsistent with any rational hypothesis except that of guilt.” ().
State v. Swanson 498 N.W.2d 435 Minn. 1993
State v. Swanson 498 N.W.2d 435 Minn. 1993
In re the Welfare of T.J.B. 488 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In re the Welfare of T.J.B. 488 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Miller 488 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 1992
State v. Miller 488 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 1992
“The stricter standard of appellate review of a conviction based on circumstantial evidence still recognizes a jury is in the best position to evaluate the circumstantial evidence surrounding the crime, and its verdict is entitled to due deference.” (citations omitted).
State v. Brovold 477 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Brovold 477 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Shepherd 477 N.W.2d 512 Minn. 1991
State v. Shepherd 477 N.W.2d 512 Minn. 1991
State v. Naylor 474 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 1991
State v. Naylor 474 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 1991
(holding prosecutorial error is curable by final instructions).
State v. Rasinski 464 N.W.2d 517 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Rasinski 464 N.W.2d 517 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
When reviewing an insufficiency of evidence claim, this court, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, “must determine whether, under the facts in the record and any legitimate inferences that can be drawn from them, a jury could reasonably conclude the defendant was guilty of the offense charged.” ().
State v. DeWald 463 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 1990
State v. DeWald 463 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 1990
State v. Bliss 457 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1990
State v. Bliss 457 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1990
State v. Drieman 457 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 1990
State v. Drieman 457 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 1990
State v. Hysell 449 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Hysell 449 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Totimeh 433 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Totimeh 433 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Hayes 428 N.W.2d 871 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Hayes 428 N.W.2d 871 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Merrill 428 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 1988
State v. Merrill 428 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 1988
State v. Redding 422 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1988
State v. Redding 422 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1988
2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)
State v. Scruggs 421 N.W.2d 707 Minn. 1988
State v. Scruggs 421 N.W.2d 707 Minn. 1988
State v. Bias 419 N.W.2d 480 Minn. 1988
State v. Bias 419 N.W.2d 480 Minn. 1988
State v. Parker 417 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 1988
State v. Parker 417 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 1988
(stating that prosecutor’s remarks concerning lack of evidence of vandalism of life raft were not intended to suggest that defendant had burden of proving his lack of guilt but were intended as a challenge to one of the defense’s rebuttal theories).
Race v. State 417 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 1987
Race v. State 417 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 1987
against claims that the evidence of his guilt was insufficient, that his counsel failed to represent him effectively at trial, and that the prosecutor committed prejudicial misconduct in closing argument.
State v. Wilford 408 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 1987
State v. Wilford 408 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 1987
State v. Doughman 404 N.W.2d 867 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Doughman 404 N.W.2d 867 Minn. Ct. App. 1987