Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Race, 383 N.W.2d 656.
- Irwin v. State 400 N.W.2d 783 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Irwin v. State 400 N.W.2d 783 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Gould 399 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Gould 399 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Alexander 398 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
State v. Alexander
398 N.W.2d 24
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
We also note that prosecutorial error is sometimes curable by corrective instructions
- State v. Sutherlin 396 N.W.2d 238 Minn. 1986
-
State v. Sutherlin
396 N.W.2d 238
Minn. 1986
Relevant cases include: State v. Kirvelay, 311 Minn. 201
- State v. Iverson 396 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Iverson 396 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. McBroom 394 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
State v. McBroom
394 N.W.2d 806
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The “jury is in the best position to evaluate the circumstantial evidence surrounding the crime, and its verdict is entitled to due deference.”
- State v. Casady 392 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Casady 392 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 1986