Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State, City of Eagan v. Elmourabit, 373 N.W.2d 290.
- State of Minnesota v. Joseph Archie Grenier Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- Melissa Ann Lorsung v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. 2026
-
Melissa Ann Lorsung v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Minn. 2026
We have held that successful performance on dexterity tests has probative value but does not have “in and of [itself], any inherent ‘unimpeachable’ character.”
-
State of Minnesota v. Jacquelyn Jeanne Libis
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
as an example of a case where appellant’s conviction was reversed for insufficient evidence after this court applied the circumstantial- evidence test.
-
S tate of Minnesota v. Joseph Harrison Baynes
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Lastly, we reject Baynes’s
-
State of Minnesota v. Jesse Paul Kaska
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
He focuses on the lack of evidence of poor driving conduct and, he argues that there is a rational hypothesis based on the circumstances proved that his ability or capacity to drive was not impaired.
-
Melissa Ann Lorsung v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
–93 (Minn. 1985); 7 Mesenburg v. Comm’r of Pub.
- State of Minnesota v. Daniel Scott Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Daniel Scott Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
Jesse Bruce Jensen v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Appellant next relies on State, City of Eagan v. Elmourabit , , 293 (Minn. 1985), for the proposition that, while the odor of alcohol might indicate impairment, it does not resolve whether a person was drinking alcohol to establish probable cause.
-
Henry James Johnson, Jr. v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
establishes “that speeding [is] not a reliable indicia of intoxication because it [is] not uncommon for sober drivers to speed as well.” But Elmourabit is inapplicable because it relates to the sufficiency of evidence at trial necessary for a criminal DWI conviction, not whether an officer had
- State of Minnesota v. Pedro Ricardo Flores Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-
State of Minnesota v. Olusegun Adebayo Osunlana
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
where the supreme court held that there was insufficient evidence to uphold a conviction for driving while impaired.
- State of Minnesota v. Olga Nichols Minn. Ct. App. 2021
- State of Minnesota v. Michal James Berger Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- State of Minnesota v. Terrance Dujuan Mann Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-
State of Minnesota v. Edward Gary Kowalzyk
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
The state can prove the under-the-influence-of-alcohol element by “showing the amount of liquor consumed (either by witnesses or chemical tests), or by evidence of outward manifestations of intoxication, or by a combination of both methods.” -87 (Minn. App. 2012) (providing that an “alcohol concentration over the legal limit” is a factor to consider under subdivision 1(1)).
- State of Minnesota v. Laurie Ann McIntyre Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-
Distinguished
State of Minnesota v. Travis Adam Westgaard
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
d 290, 294 (Minn. 1985).
-
Justin Robert Price v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
4 (Minn. 1992), including “outward manifestations of intoxication.” State v. Elmourabit , .
- State of Minnesota v. Paula Jean Yackel Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Paula Jean Yackel Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Asa James Kingsbury Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota v. Asa James Kingsbury
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Driving While Under the Influence of Alcohol To prove this offense, the state was required to show that Kingsbury was “so affected by intoxicating liquor as not to possess that clearness of intellect and control of himself that he otherwise would have.” (quotation omitted).
- State of Minnesota v. Andrew Laverne DeBerry Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Andrew Laverne DeBerry Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Rodney Joseph Hill Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Rodney Joseph Hill Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Karen Marie O’Farrell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
State of Minnesota v. Karen Marie O’Farrell
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
A person is under the influence when he is so affected by alcohol “as not to possess that clearness of intellect and control of himself that he otherwise would have.” (quotation omitted).
- State v. Ards 816 N.W.2d 679 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
-
State v. Ards
816 N.W.2d 679
Minn. Ct. App. 2012
-93 (Minn.1985) (considering sufficiency of evidence in conviction of DWI when evidence included opinion testimony of two police officers that defendant was under the influence of alcohol); State v. Hicks, 301 Minn. 350, 354 , (holding that absence of one indicator of intoxication does n
- State v. MOHOMOUD 788 N.W.2d 152 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-
State v. MOHOMOUD
788 N.W.2d 152
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
in which the supreme court affirmed our reversal of Elmourabit’s conviction of driving while impaired, holding that the evidence was insufficient to prove that charge.
- State v. Hegstrom 543 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
- State v. Hegstrom 543 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
- State v. Kissner 541 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- State v. Kissner 541 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- State v. Horning 535 N.W.2d 296 Minn. 1995
- State v. Horning 511 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
State v. Horning
511 N.W.2d 27
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
however, the Minnesota Supreme Court, in discussing the proper evidentiary weight to assign videotaped dexterity or sobriety tests, found that success on dexterity tests is not determinative because a person may be under the influence even though “he may attend to his business and may not give any outward
- State v. Shepard 481 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1992
- State v. Shepard 481 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1992
- State v. Shepard 473 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
-
State v. Shepard
473 N.W.2d 318
Minn. Ct. App. 1991
the Minnesota Supreme Court affirmed this court’s decision which *322 found insufficient evidence to support a jury verdict of guilt.
- State v. Teske 390 N.W.2d 388 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Teske 390 N.W.2d 388 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Hook 376 N.W.2d 296 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
State v. Hook
376 N.W.2d 296
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
(defendant found guilty of D.W.I., no blood alcohol test was given).