Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Nordling v. Northern States Power Co., 478 N.W.2d 498.

45 citing documents.

Emily Anick, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Petroskey v. Lommen, Nelson, Cole & 4 At oral argument, Anick’s counsel asserted that bad blood between Bonsante and Anick’s husband provided evidence of malice.
Aaron Reimringer, Minn. 2021
(stating that a person engages in bad faith if he or she engages in “wrongful conduct done without legal justification or excuse”); Rico v. State , (stating that bad faith is “willful violation of a known right”); see also Minnwest Bank Cent.
Wayne P. Steffens, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
at 22; Nordling v. N. States Power Co. , .
In re the Marriage of: Diana Lynne Neumann, n/k/a Diana Lynne deVries, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(stating that failure by a respondent to file a notice of review limits issues on appeal to those properly raised by appellant), rev’d on other grounds , .
A18-1656 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A18-0391 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Stephani Martinsen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Furlev Sales & Assoc., Inc. v. N. Am.
James L. Mandel v. Multiband Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2016
James L. Mandel v. Multiband Corporation Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(noting that the Minnesota Supreme Court “has not made clear” whether the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing exists in employment contracts); Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y of the U.S., (“We have never decided whether such a condition of good
George E. Antrim, III, PLLC v. Samar Sabri a/k/a Samar M. Tomala a/k/a Samar Meri Tomala a/k/a Samar … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
George E. Antrim, III, PLLC v. Samar Sabri a/k/a Samar M. Tomala a/k/a Samar Meri Tomala a/k/a Samar … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See, (“The discharged attorney is entitled to recover in only quantum meruit for services rendered to the time of discharge .
Moore v. Hoff 821 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Moore v. Hoff 821 N.W.2d 591 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
(referring to the previously used term "notice of review,” which is synonymous with the current term "notice of related appeal”), rev’d on other grounds
Brenny v. Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota 813 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Brenny v. Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota 813 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Emerson v. School Board of Independent School District 199 782 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Emerson v. School Board of Independent School District 199 782 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
rev’d, see In re Cont’l Tel.
Kratzer v. Welsh Companies, LLC 771 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 2009
Kratzer v. Welsh Companies, LLC 771 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 2009
hield-wiper device did not allege illegal conduct necessary to support a whistleblower claim); (concluding that a report alleging that firefighters were “showing up at fire calls while drunk” suggested reprehensible conduct but did not present a violation of a law such that the report would be protected); (concluding that a report about behavior that “seems distasteful and ...
Kidwell v. Sybaritic, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 855 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Kidwell v. Sybaritic, Inc. 749 N.W.2d 855 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
in which the supreme court considered a lawsuit brought by a former in-house attorney whose employment had been terminated.
Stageberg v. Stageberg 695 N.W.2d 609 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Stageberg v. Stageberg 695 N.W.2d 609 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Ashford v. Interstate Trucking Corp. of Am., Inc., -03 (Minn.App.1994).
Guercio v. Production Automation Corp. 664 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Guercio v. Production Automation Corp. 664 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Metge v. Central Neighborhood Improvement Ass'n 649 N.W.2d 488 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Metge v. Central Neighborhood Improvement Ass'n 649 N.W.2d 488 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
in support of this conclusion.
Bebo v. Delander 632 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Bebo v. Delander 632 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Wallin v. Minnesota Department of Corrections 598 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Wallin v. Minnesota Department of Corrections 598 N.W.2d 393 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Kallok v. Medtronic, Inc. 573 N.W.2d 356 Minn. 1998
Kallok v. Medtronic, Inc. 573 N.W.2d 356 Minn. 1998
754, 756 (1927); (holding that third party “meddlers” should not be permitted to interfere with an at-will employment agreement).
Carter v. Peace Officers Standards & Training Board 547 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Carter v. Peace Officers Standards & Training Board 547 N.W.2d 431 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
(tortious interference claim will lie for at-will employment agreement when corporate officer acts outside of corporate duties).
Lipka v. MINN. SCHOOL EMPLOY. ASS'N. 537 N.W.2d 624 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Lipka v. MINN. SCHOOL EMPLOY. ASS'N. 537 N.W.2d 624 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Lipka v. Minnesota School Employees Ass'n, Local 1980 537 N.W.2d 624 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Lipka v. Minnesota School Employees Ass'n, Local 1980 537 N.W.2d 624 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Glass Service Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 530 N.W.2d 867 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Glass Service Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 530 N.W.2d 867 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
In Re Hennepin County 1986 Recycling Bond Litigation 517 N.W.2d 63 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
In Re Hennepin County 1986 Recycling Bond Litigation 517 N.W.2d 63 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
McDonough v. City of Rosemount 503 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
McDonough v. City of Rosemount 503 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 1993