Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Garrett, 479 N.W.2d 745.

21 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. William Gray Peterson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. William Gray Peterson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
1 (2018), A.R.’s testimony was corroborated by her interview with the social worker in which she described the sexual abuse consistent with her trial testimony, (determining that a sexual assault victim’s testimony was corroborated by her consistent prior statements), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(determining that a sexual-assault victim’s testimony was corroborated by her consistent prior statements), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Garrett , review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
The state counters that , “[A] departure is not prohibited where ‘the record clearly indicates that the trial court originally intended to depart’ even if the court did not make verbal findings,”
State of Minnesota v. Andrew Leonard Caruthers Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Andrew Leonard Caruthers Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Corey Gordon Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Corey Gordon Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Witness “credibility is not an issue for this court to consider on appeal.” review denied (Minn. Mar.
Carter v. State 787 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Carter v. State 787 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
review denied (Minn. Mar.
State v. Geller 665 N.W.2d 514 Minn. 2003
State v. Geller 665 N.W.2d 514 Minn. 2003
State v. McAdory 543 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. McAdory 543 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
See Sundstrom, d at 216 (remanding to give trial court opportunity to determine if case supports departure where trial court had erred in determining a consecutive sentence was not a departure from sentencing guidelines); -49 (Minn.App.1992) (remanding to allow court to make findings to support departure where record indicated court intended to depart, but had not made any findings to support departure), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State v. Wilkinson 539 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Wilkinson 539 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
(departure allowable on sentencing remand for failure to make findings when record shows original sentencing court contemplated departure), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State v. Halvorson 506 N.W.2d 331 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Halvorson 506 N.W.2d 331 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(victim’s testimony corroborated by prior consistent statements, prompt reporting, behavior after assault, and nature of injury), pet.