Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Matter of Zemple, 489 N.W.2d 818.
- In re the Marriage of: Xiaoyan Sun, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
Heidi Lee Wolf, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
201(b); (holding district court may take judicial notice of prior ruling but not prior testimonial assertions).
- In the Matter of: Carole Anne Rosemary Dobson, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-
State of Minnesota, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(concluding that a district court did not abuse its discretion by taking judici al notice of findings made in a separate proceeding).
-
Kristin M. Schumacher, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Accordingly, we will not consider Terry’s request to take judicial notice of Kristin’s newly purchased home, because it is outside the record and the purchase cannot be established by a source “whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned .” See Matter of Zemple , (quotation omitted) (stating standard for taking judicial notice).
- In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: David Leroy Gamble, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: David Leroy Gamble, Jr.
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
201(b); (applying an abuse-of-discretion standard for review of judicial notice).
- Colleen Marie Berg v. Michael Vincent Flaherty Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
Colleen Marie Berg v. Michael Vincent Flaherty
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
201 (addressing judicial notice); (explaining that the district court did not abuse its discretion by taking judicial notice of findings made in a previous proceeding).
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. E. N. and R. D. J., Jr., … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. E. N. and R. D. J., Jr., … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Christopher R. Coker, (A15-1439, A15-1445), (A15-1606) v. Emily Johnson Piper, Commissioner of Human Services, (A15-1439), (A15-1606), Hennepin County, … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
Christopher R. Coker, (A15-1439, A15-1445), (A15-1606) v. Emily Johnson Piper, Commissioner of Human Services, (A15-1439), (A15-1606), Hennepin County, …
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A judicially noticed fact must be one not subject to reasonable dispute in that it is either (1) generally known within the territorial jurisdiction of the trial court or (2) capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.” (quotation omitted).
- Mark Michael Dwyer v. Tamara Jo Molde Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Mark Michael Dwyer v. Tamara Jo Molde
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
201 (addressing judicial notice); (holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in taking judicial notice of findings made in previously adjudicated proceedings).
- In re the Estate of: Mary Ann Nething Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- In re the Estate of: Mary Ann Nething Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Gary E. Mitchell, John Doe 862 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Gary E. Mitchell, John Doe 862 N.W.2d 67 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Marriage of Geske v. Marcolina 624 N.W.2d 813 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
-
Marriage of Geske v. Marcolina
624 N.W.2d 813
Minn. Ct. App. 2001
The 1998 child-support order states that mother then earned $28.94 per hour, worked 42 47 hours every two weeks, had a net monthly income of $2,207.92, and “listed monthly expenses of $2,644 for herself and the two children!)]” 3 (holding district court may take judicial notice of prior ruling but not prior testimonial assertions).
- Rohricht v. O'HARE 586 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-
Rohricht v. O'HARE
586 N.W.2d 587
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Appellant relies on for this argument, but his reliance is misplaced.
- In Re the Welfare of D.J.N. 568 N.W.2d 170 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-
In Re the Welfare of D.J.N.
568 N.W.2d 170
Minn. Ct. App. 1997
(holding that testimony from a prior proceeding was not properly the subject of judicial notice because facts addressed in the testimony were “not beyond dispute”); (holding that it was proper for commitment court to take judicial notice of doctors’