Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Southtown Plumbing, Inc. v. Har-Ned Lumber Co., 493 N.W.2d 137.

36 citing documents.

MOAC Mall Holdings, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Co., d at 497); see Southtown Plumbing, (“It is well settled in Minnesota that one may not seek a remedy in equity when there is an adequate remedy at law.”).
Great North Capital Consultants, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
where there is an adequate legal remedy.” Southtown Plumbing
Chad Monson, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
4 In other words, “[t]he right to recovery for unjust enrichment is equitable.” Southtown Plumbing, Inc. v. Har -Ned Lumber Co.
Smart Construction & Remodeling, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
2015) (stating that quantum meruit is “a claim in equity as restitution for the value of a benefit conferred in the absence of a contract under a theory of unjust enrichment”); Banbury v. Omnitrition Int’l, Inc., (stating that “the doctrine of promissory estoppel only applies where no contract exists”); Southtown Plumbing, (stating that “[r]elief under the theory of unjust enrichment is not available where there is an adequate legal remedy” and that the party seeking equitable relief “had a reme
David Carl Hepfl, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Unjust enrichment is an 5 equitable remedy, Southtown Plumbing, and we review a district court’s order granting equitable relief for an abuse of discretion
Platinum Edge Properties, LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“It is well settled in Minnesota that one may not seek a remedy in equity when there is an adequate remedy at law.” Southtown Plumbing
Scott Lee Neiman, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
S. M. Hentges & Sons, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See id.; see also Southtown Plumbing, (concluding that contractor could not prevail on unjust-enrichment claim because it had adequate contractual and mechanic’s-lien remedies).
Craig Scherber & Associates, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
For Bullock to prove unjust enrichment, it must show that Scherber “has knowingly received something of value, not being entitled to the benefit, and under circumstances that would make it unjust to permit its retention.” Southtown Plumbing
Travis Colsen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“It is well settled in Minnesota that one may not seek a remedy in equity when there is an adequate remedy at law.” Southtown Plumbing
Pohocogo, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Streambend Properties II, LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“It is well settled in Minnesota that one may not seek a remedy in equity when there is an adequate remedy at law.” Southtown Plumbing, d 137, 140 (Minn. App. 1992); see U.S. Fire Ins.
Crow Wing Cooperative Power and Light Company, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“It is well settled in Minnesota that one may not seek a remedy in equity when there is an adequate remedy at law.” Southtown Plumbing
Andrew Carufel, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Southtown Plumbing, (“It is well settled in Minnesota that one may not seek a remedy in equity when there is an adequate remedy at law.
North Country Tire and Auto, Inc., et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Southtown Plumbing, Inc. v. Har -Ned Lumber Co., Inc.
In re the Estate of: Donald H. Richter, deceased Gerald Donald Richter, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Southtown Plumbing, Inc. v. Har-Ned Lumber Co., Inc.
Allen Battle v. Auto Sales 1, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Allen Battle v. Auto Sales 1, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Starry Electric, Inc. v. Gilman Cooperative Creamery Association Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Starry Electric, Inc. v. Gilman Cooperative Creamery Association Minn. Ct. App. 2016
CSM Equities, LLC v. Woodland Village Investments Limited Partnership Minn. Ct. App. 2016
CSM Equities, LLC v. Woodland Village Investments Limited Partnership Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Diversified Water Diversion, Inc. v. Hogenson Properties, Ltd. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Diversified Water Diversion, Inc. v. Hogenson Properties, Ltd. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Estate of Neuman 819 N.W.2d 211 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re the Estate of Neuman 819 N.W.2d 211 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
First Nat’l Southtown Plumbing, *217 140 (Minn.App.1992).
Curtis v. Altria Group, Inc. 792 N.W.2d 836 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Curtis v. Altria Group, Inc. 792 N.W.2d 836 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Minneapolis Grand, LLC v. Galt Funding LLC 791 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Minneapolis Grand, LLC v. Galt Funding LLC 791 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
See Southtown Plumbing, Inc. v. Har-Ned Lumber Co., Inc., (“The right of recovery for unjust enrichment is equitable.”); Keough v. St.
Mon-Ray, Inc. v. Granite Re, Inc. 677 N.W.2d 434 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Mon-Ray, Inc. v. Granite Re, Inc. 677 N.W.2d 434 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
See Southtown Plumbing, Inc. v. Har-Ned Lumber Co., Inc., (holding that subcontractors do not have a claim for unjust enrichment when they fail to pursue their available statutory remedy).
Schumacher v. Schumacher 627 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Schumacher v. Schumacher 627 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
and Loan Ass’n, 291 Minn. 68, 71 , (unjust enrichment shown where conduct was similar in nature to fraud); Southtown *730 Plumbing, Inc. v. Har-Ned Lumber Co., Inc., (unjust enrichment may be shown by circumstances that would make it unjust to permit retention); Park-Lake Car Wash, (unjust enrichment may be found absent fraud where a party’s conduct has been “unconscionable by reason of a bad motive, or whe
ServiceMaster of St. Cloud v. GAB Business Services, Inc. 530 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
ServiceMaster of St. Cloud v. GAB Business Services, Inc. 530 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 1995