Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Watson v. United Services Automobile Ass'n, 566 N.W.2d 683.
- Garlyn, Inc. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. 814 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
- Garlyn, Inc. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. 814 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
- 301 Clifton Place L.L.C. v. 301 Clifton Place Condominium Ass'n 783 N.W.2d 551 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-
301 Clifton Place L.L.C. v. 301 Clifton Place Condominium Ass'n
783 N.W.2d 551
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Ass’n, (quotation and emphasis omitted).
- SCI Minnesota Funeral Services, Inc. v. Washburn-McReavy Funeral Corp. 779 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-
SCI Minnesota Funeral Services, Inc. v. Washburn-McReavy Funeral Corp.
779 N.W.2d 865
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Ass’n, (deciding an issue for the first time on appeal that was based on undisputed facts and where neither party was disadvantaged by the lack of an earlier district court ruling on the issue).
- Brua v. MINNESOTA JOINT UNDERWRITING ASS'N 778 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 2010
- Brua v. MINNESOTA JOINT UNDERWRITING ASS'N 778 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 2010
- SECURA Supreme Insurance Company v. MSM 755 N.W.2d 320 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
SECURA Supreme Insurance Company v. MSM
755 N.W.2d 320
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Ass’n, (stating that, without any mention of a severability clause, “[cjourts have found no ambiguity ...
- In Re the Estate of Barg 752 N.W.2d 52 Minn. 2008
- In Re the Estate of Barg 752 N.W.2d 52 Minn. 2008
- State v. Everson 749 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 2008
- State v. Everson 749 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 2008
- Kunza v. St. Mary's Regional Health Center 747 N.W.2d 586 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
Kunza v. St. Mary's Regional Health Center
747 N.W.2d 586
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Ass’n, -88 (Minn.1997) (emphasis omitted) (quotation and citation omitted).
- Blume Law Firm PC v. Pierce 741 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- Blume Law Firm PC v. Pierce 741 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Bloomington Steel & Supply Co. 718 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 2006
-
Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Bloomington Steel & Supply Co.
718 N.W.2d 888
Minn. 2006
4 As we held in Watson v. United Services Automobile Ass’n, -92 (Minn.1997), an exclusion in a fire insurance policy for loss caused by the act of “an insured” excludes coverage for co-insured spouses, even when they are not responsible for the property damage at issue, although such clauses conflict with the Minnesota standard fire insurance policy and are therefore unenf
- Roth v. Weir 690 N.W.2d 410 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
-
Roth v. Weir
690 N.W.2d 410
Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Ass’n, -88 (Minn.1997) (citations and emphasis omitted).
- Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Glass Service Co. 683 N.W.2d 792 Minn. 2004
-
Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Glass Service Co.
683 N.W.2d 792
Minn. 2004
Ass’n, (holding that Minnesota standard fire insurance policy provides statutory minimum coverage).
- State v. Kier 678 N.W.2d 672 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
-
State v. Kier
678 N.W.2d 672
Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Ass’n, -88 (Minn.1997) *676 (stating factors appellate court should consider in choosing to address issue not raised below).
- TIG Insurance Co. v. Anderson 663 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-
TIG Insurance Co. v. Anderson
663 N.W.2d 1
Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Assoc., (quotation omitted).
- Mattice v. Minnesota Property Insurance Placement 655 N.W.2d 336 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- Mattice v. Minnesota Property Insurance Placement 655 N.W.2d 336 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- Stout v. AMCO Insurance Co. 645 N.W.2d 108 Minn. 2002
-
Stout v. AMCO Insurance Co.
645 N.W.2d 108
Minn. 2002
Ass’n, Meister v. W. Nat'l Mut.
- Home Insurance Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance of Pittsburgh 643 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- Home Insurance Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance of Pittsburgh 643 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
- Flynn v. American Home Products Corp. 627 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
-
Flynn v. American Home Products Corp.
627 N.W.2d 342
Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Ass’n, (explaining the requirements for review of issue not addressed in district court); Pikop v. Burlington N. R., 390 * (preemption is a matter of statutory construction that appellate courts review de novo).
- In Re the Welfare of R.J.R. 622 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
-
In Re the Welfare of R.J.R.
622 N.W.2d 160
Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Ass’n, (citation omitted).
- Oanes v. Allstate Insurance Co. 617 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 2000
-
Oanes v. Allstate Insurance Co.
617 N.W.2d 401
Minn. 2000
Ass’n, (quoting Holen v. Minneapolis-St.
- Glass Service Co. v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Co. 603 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Glass Service Co. v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Co. 603 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Nathe Bros., Inc. v. American National Fire Insurance Co. 597 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- Nathe Bros., Inc. v. American National Fire Insurance Co. 597 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- Sather v. Woodland Liquors, Inc. 597 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- Sather v. Woodland Liquors, Inc. 597 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- Lundberg Ex Rel. Lundberg v. Jeep Corp. 582 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- Lundberg Ex Rel. Lundberg v. Jeep Corp. 582 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- Collins v. USAA Property and Casualty Insurance Co. 580 N.W.2d 55 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- Collins v. USAA Property and Casualty Insurance Co. 580 N.W.2d 55 Minn. Ct. App. 1998