Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Watson v. United Services Automobile Ass'n, 566 N.W.2d 683.

104 citing documents.

Rebecca A. Niebuhr v. Jacob Sieberg, Timothy Sieberg Minn. 2026
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L.K., Parent Minn. 2026
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L.K., Parent Minn. 2026
Ass’n, d 683, 687 (Minn. 1997)).
Dametria White, et al., as co-trustees for the next-of-kin of Helayne Bass, deceased, Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Ariel, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Paul Hansmeier, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Ass’n, (stating “the general rule .
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. K. and A. S., Parents 9 N.W.3d 174 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. K. and A. S., Parents 9 N.W.3d 174 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Ass’n, (quotation omitted); see also Oanes v. Allstate Ins.
In the Matter of the Appeal by Pond Early Childhood Family Development Center of the Order to Pay … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Appeal by Pond Early Childhood Family Development Center of the Order to Pay … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Lisa Stone, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Invitation Homes, Inc., ... Minn. 2024
Lisa Stone, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Invitation Homes, Inc., ... Minn. 2024
Jacqueline Blakey, Jerry Blakey v. Javonda Jones, Gina Alexander, ... Minn. 2023
Jacqueline Blakey, Jerry Blakey v. Javonda Jones, Gina Alexander, ... Minn. 2023
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Minn. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
which sets forth a four-factor test for determining whether an exception applies.
City of Long Prairie, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Ass’n , (quotation omitted).
Criticized Jordan Carroll, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Brian James Turner. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Ass’n , -88 (Minn. 1997) (deciding new issue on appeal when the fact s were undisputed and the issue was raised prominently in the appellate briefing, was an issue of first impression, and involved a statute-based theory).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Tony Flattum, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Ass’n, (quotation omitted), absent those circumstances, parties are “bound .
Pleasure Creek Townhomes Homeowners’ Association, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
John Carl Berg, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Ass’n, (“[T]he general rule is 13 that appellate courts will not consider questions which were not presented to or decided by the district court.”).
Community First Bank, a Wisconsin banking corporation, Plaintiff, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Ass’n , d 683, 688 (Minn. 1997) (stating that “the parties in this case do not dispute the facts; thus, there is no possible advantage or disadvantage to either party”).
Jake Anthony Scharber-Pikula, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Ass’n, (quotation omitted).
David Forster, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Ass’n , -88 (Minn. 1997) (deciding new issue on appeal where it was a novel issue of first impression, a statute-based theory, and relied on undisputed facts).
In re the Welfare of I.N.A. 902 N.W.2d 635 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Welfare of I.N.A. 902 N.W.2d 635 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Ass’n, (quotation omitted); -76 (Minn. App. 2004) (applying the factors in Watson to a criminal case), review denied (Minn. June 15, 2004).
North Star Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Poehler v. Cincinnati Insurance Co. 899 N.W.2d 135 Minn. 2017
Poehler v. Cincinnati Insurance Co. 899 N.W.2d 135 Minn. 2017
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Michelle R. Fogarty. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Ass’n , (quotation omitted) .
Allan Fishel, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Ass’n, ( citation and quotation omitted).
Mark Randall v. Healtheast/St. John�s Hospital Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Mark Randall v. Healtheast/St. John�s Hospital Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Ass’n, (deciding an issue on appeal where it was a novel issue of first impression, statute-based theory, and undisputed facts); n.6 (Minn. 2007) (addressing the constitutionality of a statute questioned for the first time in the supreme court “[b]ecause a
Thomas v. Engfer v. General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development 869 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 2015
Thomas v. Engfer v. General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development 869 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 2015
Ass’n, (quoting Holen v. Minneapolis-St.
In re the Estate of: Barbara Jean LaPoint Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Estate of: Barbara Jean LaPoint Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Auto Ass’n., –88 (Minn. 1997)).
Lyon Financial Services, Inc., d/b/a U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group with its principal offices at Marshall, Minnesota … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Lyon Financial Services, Inc., d/b/a U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group with its principal offices at Marshall, Minnesota … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ass’n, -88 (Minn. 1997) (deciding new issue on appeal where it was novel issue of first impression, statute-based theory, and undisputed facts).
Restore House, Inc. v. Helga Township Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Restore House, Inc. v. Helga Township Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Ass’n, (quotation omitted); n.6 (Minn. 2008) (addressing a pure legal question); Oanes 6 v. Allstate Ins.
Ken B. Peterson, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry v. United Parcel Service, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Ken B. Peterson, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry v. United Parcel Service, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Ass’n, -88 (Minn. 1997) (recognizing and applying an exception for arguments that are “implicit in or closely akin to the arguments below,” “raised prominently in briefing,” and “not dependent on any new or controverted facts” (citation and quotation marks omitted)).
Doe 175 ex rel. Doe 175 v. Columbia Heights School District, ISD No. 13 842 N.W.2d 38 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Doe 175 ex rel. Doe 175 v. Columbia Heights School District, ISD No. 13 842 N.W.2d 38 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Meriwether Minnesota Land & Timber, LLC v. State 818 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Meriwether Minnesota Land & Timber, LLC v. State 818 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Ass’n, (noting factors that favor review of an issue not decided by the district court).