Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Joel v. Wellman, 551 N.W.2d 729.

25 citing documents.

In re the Matter of: E. M. B., DOB February 14, 2014, Sharo’n Lily Isabella Mathison, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
3; see also Joel v. Wellman , (explaining how to calculate “a period of 12 months or more” when a grandparent peti tions for visitation) , rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
Enright v. Lehmann 724 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Enright v. Lehmann 724 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
review denied (Minn. Oct.
Gale v. Rittenhouse 686 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Gale v. Rittenhouse 686 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
review denied (Minn. Oct.
In Re Horton 668 N.W.2d 208 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re Horton 668 N.W.2d 208 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
review denied (Minn. Oct.
State v. McBride 666 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 2003
State v. McBride 666 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 2003
review denied (Minn. Oct.
Longrie v. Luthen 662 N.W.2d 150 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Longrie v. Luthen 662 N.W.2d 150 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Comm’n, review denied (Minn. Oct.
Britamco Underwriters, Inc. v. a & a Liquors of St. Cloud 649 N.W.2d 867 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Britamco Underwriters, Inc. v. a & a Liquors of St. Cloud 649 N.W.2d 867 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
review denied (Minn. Oct.
Schiff v. Griffin 639 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Schiff v. Griffin 639 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Comm’n, review denied (Minn. Oct.
Eagle Creek Townhomes, LLP v. City of Shakopee 614 N.W.2d 246 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Eagle Creek Townhomes, LLP v. City of Shakopee 614 N.W.2d 246 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
review denied (Minn. Oct.
Nordvick v. Commissioner of Public Safety 610 N.W.2d 659 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Nordvick v. Commissioner of Public Safety 610 N.W.2d 659 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
review denied (Minn. Oct.
Conant v. Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, L.L.P. 603 N.W.2d 143 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Conant v. Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, L.L.P. 603 N.W.2d 143 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
review denied (Minn. Oct.
Professional Management Associates, Inc. v. Coss 598 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Professional Management Associates, Inc. v. Coss 598 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
When the facts are undisputed, standing “is a legal issue that this court may determine.” (citations omitted), review denied (Minn. Oct.
Lucio v. School Board of Independent School District No. 625 574 N.W.2d 737 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Lucio v. School Board of Independent School District No. 625 574 N.W.2d 737 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
3 “Standing goes to the existence of a cause of action and, when the facts are not disputed, is a legal issue that this court may determine.” review denied (Minn. Oct.