DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Tullis v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co., 570 N.W.2d 309.

58 citing documents.

Walter Smith v. Eric A. Johnson, Steven Scott Properties Management, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Walter Smith v. Eric A. Johnson, Steven Scott Properties Management, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Shawn Drewicke v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Shawn Drewicke v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Lisa Thielen, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
The Gables at the Reserve Homeowners Association, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Co., (quotation omitted).
Kevin Makowski, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Co., d 309, 311 (Minn. 1997).
A p p e l l a n t s , Minn. 2020
Carol Eppolite, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Evan Andrew Lautigar, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Thomas R. Blanck, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Abdel Elnashar, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Janet M. Bauch, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Livingston Financial, LLC, as successor in interest to US Bank, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Steven J. Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, Franklin Financial, LLC 884 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 2016
Steven J. Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, Franklin Financial, LLC 884 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 2016
Co., (explaining that service of process in a manner not authorized by rule is ineffective).
Keith Melillo v. Terry Arden Heitland 880 N.W.2d 862 Minn. 2016
Keith Melillo v. Terry Arden Heitland 880 N.W.2d 862 Minn. 2016
Jennifer L. DeCook, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. Olmsted Medical Center, Inc., Brenda J. Hanson, R.N., and Darlene M. Pratt, R.N., … 875 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 2016
Distinguished Jennifer L. DeCook, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. Olmsted Medical Center, Inc., Brenda J. Hanson, R.N., and Darlene M. Pratt, R.N., … 875 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 2016
Ruth Unger v. AAA Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ruth Unger v. AAA Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Co., (“Service of process in a manner not authorized by the rule is ineffective service.”).
Amaal Mohammed Shire v. Minneapolis Public Housing Authority, Lester L. Hall Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Amaal Mohammed Shire v. Minneapolis Public Housing Authority, Lester L. Hall Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Katherine JoAnn Lange, Thomas James Putman v. State Farm Insurance Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Katherine JoAnn Lange, Thomas James Putman v. State Farm Insurance Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re Application of Skyline Materials, Ltd. 835 N.W.2d 472 Minn. 2013
In re Application of Skyline Materials, Ltd. 835 N.W.2d 472 Minn. 2013
Co., (explaining that the court obtains jurisdiction over a defendant through proper service of process); Sievert v. Selvig, 175 Minn. 597, 598 , 222 N.W.
Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. Lam 814 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 2012
Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. Lam 814 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 2012
Co., (explaining that the court obtains jurisdiction over a defendant through proper service of process); (explaining that proper service of process “serves the important function of actual, formal notice to the defendant of the action”
In re the Risk Level Determination of J.M.T. 759 N.W.2d 406 Minn. 2009
In Re Jmt 759 N.W.2d 406 Minn. 2009
In Re Jmt 759 N.W.2d 406 Minn. 2009
In re the Risk Level Determination of J.M.T. 759 N.W.2d 406 Minn. 2009
Smith v. Flotterud 716 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Smith v. Flotterud 716 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Mercer v. Andersen 715 N.W.2d 114 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Mercer v. Andersen 715 N.W.2d 114 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Nieszner v. St. Paul School District No. 625 643 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Nieszner v. St. Paul School District No. 625 643 N.W.2d 645 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Ryan Contracting, Inc. v. Jag Investments, Inc. 634 N.W.2d 176 Minn. 2001
Ryan Contracting, Inc. v. Jag Investments, Inc. 634 N.W.2d 176 Minn. 2001
Co., (“Service of process in a manner not authorized by the rule is ineffective service.”); Berryhill v. Sepp, 106 Minn. 458, 459 , 119 N.W.
Year 2001 Budget Appeal of Landgren v. Pipestone County Board of Commissioners 633 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Year 2001 Budget Appeal of Landgren v. Pipestone County Board of Commissioners 633 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Co., ), review denied (Minn. July 28, 1999).
In Re the Welfare of T.D. 631 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re the Welfare of T.D. 631 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Co., ) (construing Minn. R. Civ.
Turek v. A.S.P. of Moorhead, Inc. 618 N.W.2d 609 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Turek v. A.S.P. of Moorhead, Inc. 618 N.W.2d 609 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Co., ), review denied (Minn. July 28, 1999); see Minn. R.Civ.P.
Patterson v. Wu Family Corp. 608 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 2000
Patterson v. Wu Family Corp. 608 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 2000