Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Chuon, 596 N.W.2d 267.

27 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In State v. Chuon, we held that a shot hitting the victim “in the shoulder blade” from a “moving car” “about six to eight feet” away sufficiently proved intent to kill because the “torso” (like the head) is “an area of the body containing vital organs.” rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
gunshot at back of victim’s head at close range); State v. Boitnott , 530-32 (Minn. 1989) (concluding that defendant intended to kill when he fired single gunshot at victim’s skull); (concluding that defendant intended to kill when he fired single shot from pen gun toward victim from distance of 12 feet); , 271 (Minn. App. 1999) (concluding that defendant int ended to kill when he fired single gunshot at victim’s shoulder from distance of six to eight feet ), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(intent inferred from a “single shot to the victim’s torso, an area of the body containing vital organs”), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Pierre Scott Glass Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Pierre Scott Glass Minn. Ct. App. 2015
–22 (Minn. 2009); 768 (Minn. 1983); –71 (Minn. App. 1999), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Eddie Niles Hubbard Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Eddie Niles Hubbard Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(concluding that a single shot fired at a victim’s vital organs from a moving car was sufficient to establish intent to kill), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. John Yang Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. John Yang Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Marsenior Pede Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Marsenior Pede Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
And we have held that a “single [gun]shot to the victim’s torso, an area of the body containing vital organs, is sufficient to support a finding of intent to kill.” d 267, 271 (Minn. App. 1999), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Caldwell 815 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Caldwell 815 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
“Intent must generally be proved by inferences from the defendant’s conduct and the surrounding circumstances.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Brown 758 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Brown 758 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
22, 2000); (finding sufficient evidence of intent to kill where defendant fired at victim, striking him in the shoulder blade, from a distance of about six to eight feet), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Skipintheday 704 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Skipintheday 704 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
(holding crime committed for the benefit of a gang is a substantive criminal offense), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. DeShay 645 N.W.2d 185 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. DeShay 645 N.W.2d 185 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
See, (allowing evidence of gang membership to prove that the defendant committed the crime for the benefit of a gang), review denied (Minn. May 15, 2001); (allowing evidence of crimes committed by criminal gang members other than the defendant), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Yang 644 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 2002
State v. Yang 644 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 2002
Yang cites four cases in support of the proposition that gang-affiliation character evidence is inadmissible outside these three circumstances: Ferguson, d at 834 ; -52 (Minn.1994); rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Carillo 623 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
State v. Carillo 623 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Oates 611 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Oates 611 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
review denied (Minn. Aug.