Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Flores, 595 N.W.2d 860.
-
Hennepin County State of Minnesota v. Tremaine Michael Bucholz Thissen, J. Concurring in part, dissenting in part, Hudson, …
Minn. 2026
For instance, –69 (Minn. 1999), we affirmed the district court in excluding evidence that an alleged alternative perpetrator was at the victim’s house shortly after the last time he was seen alive, the alleged alternative perpetrator’s business card was found in a bag of bloody clothes the defendant possessed, the victim ow
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Ryan Charles Rooney, Appellant Minn. 2025
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Ryan Charles Rooney, Appellant
Minn. 2025
See, e.g., Atkinson, d at 590 (–69 (Minn. 1999)); –09 (Minn. 2016); Woodard, d at 142.
-
Minn. 2020
See, –69 (Minn. 1999) (affirming exclusion of evidence that the victim owed the alternative perpetrator money, that alternative perpetrator had threatened a person who had failed to pay debts, that the alternative perpetrator’s business card was at the crime scene, and that the alternative perpetrator was at the vi
-
State of Minnesota v. Brian Ven Vangrevenhof
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(reviewing a hearsay ruling).
-
State of Minnesota v. Johnny Frank Logan, III
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(Minn. 7 Logan frames these arguments as a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation.
-
State of Minnesota v. Justin Carlos Tolbert
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(reviewing a hearsay ruling).
-
State of Minnesota v. Justin Michael Lang
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A district court’s evidentiary rulings generally will not be reversed absent a clear abuse of discretion, State v. Flores , and it is the appellant who bears the burden of establishing that the district court abused its discretion and that he was prejudiced as a result
-
In the Matter of: Lisa Marie Hessel, individually and o/b/o minor children v. Michael John Mohr
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(reviewing a hearsay ruling).
- State of Minnesota v. Kyle Jon Wilczek Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- State of Minnesota v. Kyle Jon Wilczek Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- R. Wynn Kearney, Jr., M.D. v. The Orthopaedic and Fracture Clinic, P.A., vs. Steven B. Curtis, et al, … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- R. Wynn Kearney, Jr., M.D. v. The Orthopaedic and Fracture Clinic, P.A., vs. Steven B. Curtis, et al, … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Zakaria Abdinasser Yusuf Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota v. Zakaria Abdinasser Yusuf
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
d 860, 865 (Minn. 1999).
- State of Minnesota v. Tarah Louise Fichtner 867 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Tarah Louise Fichtner 867 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Michael Cordale Henderson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Michael Cordale Henderson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Jeremy John Huey v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
Jeremy John Huey v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(reviewing hearsay ruling).
- Gulbertson v. State 843 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 2014
- Gulbertson v. State 843 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 2014
- State v. Castillo-Alvarez 820 N.W.2d 601 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
-
State v. Castillo-Alvarez
820 N.W.2d 601
Minn. Ct. App. 2012
(reviewing the district court’s hearsay ruling).
- State v. Ferguson 804 N.W.2d 586 Minn. 2011
-
State v. Ferguson
804 N.W.2d 586
Minn. 2011
d at 590 (-69 (Minn.1999)).
- State v. Jenkins 782 N.W.2d 211 Minn. 2010
-
State v. Jenkins
782 N.W.2d 211
Minn. 2010
We have consistently held and recently reaffirmed that “[m]ere presence at the scene of the crime does not, by itself, create an inherent tendency to connect a person alleged to be the alternative perpetrator to the commission of the charged crime.” (-69 (Minn.1999)).
- State v. Atkinson 774 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 2009
- State v. Atkinson 774 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 2009
- State v. Richardson 670 N.W.2d 267 Minn. 2003
- State v. Gutierrez 667 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 2003
- State v. Hooper 620 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 2000
- State v. Hooper 620 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 2000