Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Flores, 595 N.W.2d 860.

34 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Ryan Charles Rooney, Appellant Minn. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Ryan Charles Rooney, Appellant Minn. 2025
See, e.g., Atkinson, d at 590 (–69 (Minn. 1999)); –09 (Minn. 2016); Woodard, d at 142.
Minn. 2020
See, –69 (Minn. 1999) (affirming exclusion of evidence that the victim owed the alternative perpetrator money, that alternative perpetrator had threatened a person who had failed to pay debts, that the alternative perpetrator’s business card was at the crime scene, and that the alternative perpetrator was at the vi
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(reviewing a hearsay ruling).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(Minn. 7 Logan frames these arguments as a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(reviewing a hearsay ruling).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A district court’s evidentiary rulings generally will not be reversed absent a clear abuse of discretion, State v. Flores , and it is the appellant who bears the burden of establishing that the district court abused its discretion and that he was prejudiced as a result
In the Matter of: Lisa Marie Hessel, individually and o/b/o minor children, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(reviewing a hearsay ruling).
State of Minnesota v. Kyle Jon Wilczek Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Kyle Jon Wilczek Minn. Ct. App. 2017
R. Wynn Kearney, Jr., M.D. v. The Orthopaedic and Fracture Clinic, P.A. v. Steven B. Curtis, intervening and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
R. Wynn Kearney, Jr., M.D. v. The Orthopaedic and Fracture Clinic, P.A. v. Steven B. Curtis, intervening and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Zakaria Abdinasser Yusuf Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Zakaria Abdinasser Yusuf Minn. Ct. App. 2015
d 860, 865 (Minn. 1999).
State of Minnesota v. Tarah Louise Fichtner 867 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Tarah Louise Fichtner 867 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Michael Cordale Henderson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Michael Cordale Henderson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Jeremy John Huey v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Jeremy John Huey v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(reviewing hearsay ruling).
Gulbertson v. State 843 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 2014
Gulbertson v. State 843 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 2014
State v. Castillo-Alvarez 820 N.W.2d 601 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Castillo-Alvarez 820 N.W.2d 601 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
(reviewing the district court’s hearsay ruling).
State v. Ferguson 804 N.W.2d 586 Minn. 2011
State v. Ferguson 804 N.W.2d 586 Minn. 2011
d at 590 (-69 (Minn.1999)).
State v. Jenkins 782 N.W.2d 211 Minn. 2010
State v. Jenkins 782 N.W.2d 211 Minn. 2010
We have consistently held and recently reaffirmed that “[m]ere presence at the scene of the crime does not, by itself, create an inherent tendency to connect a person alleged to be the alternative perpetrator to the commission of the charged crime.” (-69 (Minn.1999)).
State v. Atkinson 774 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 2009
State v. Atkinson 774 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 2009
State v. Richardson 670 N.W.2d 267 Minn. 2003
State v. Gutierrez 667 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 2003
State v. Hooper 620 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 2000
State v. Hooper 620 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 2000