Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass'n, 615 N.W.2d 66.

65 citing documents.

State v. Cunningham 663 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Cunningham 663 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n
State v. Gresser 657 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Gresser 657 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n, (quotation omitted).
State v. Larivee 656 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 2003
State v. Larivee 656 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 2003
Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n, Inc.
Kolton v. County of Anoka 645 N.W.2d 403 Minn. 2002
Kolton v. County of Anoka 645 N.W.2d 403 Minn. 2002
“Both clauses have been analyzed under the same principles and begin with the mandate that all similarly situated individuals shall be treated alike, but only ‘invidious discrimination’ is deemed constitutionally offensive.” Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n
Walker v. Zuehlke 642 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 2002
State v. Wilson 632 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 2001
State v. Wilson 632 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 2001
Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n, Inc.
Kolton v. County of Anoka 628 N.W.2d 643 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Kolton v. County of Anoka 628 N.W.2d 643 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n, Inc.
Erickson v. Fullerton 619 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Erickson v. Fullerton 619 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Both federal and state equal-protection challenges “begin with the mandate that all similarly situated individuals shall be treated alike ⅜ * Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n