Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass'n, 615 N.W.2d 66.

65 citing documents.

Thomas Anthony Greshowak, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
The Equal-Protection Clause of the Minnesota Constitution guarantees that “all similarly situated individuals shall be treated alike.” Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n
Minn. 2022
Because both equal protection clauses “begin with the mandate that all similarly situated individuals shall be treated alike,” Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n, w e begin our equal protection analysis by determining “whether the law creates distinct classes within a broader group of similarly situated persons or whether those treated differently by the law are sufficiently dissimilar from others such that the law does not create different classes within
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n
State of Minnesota, by Jan Malcolm, Commissioner of Health, in her Official capacity, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Under both clauses, “only invidiou s discrimination is deemed constitutionally offensive.” Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n , (quotation omitted).
Sokkhan Ka, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Both clauses have been analyzed under the same principles and begin with the mandate that all similarly sit uated individuals shall be treated alike, but only invidious discrimination is deemed constitutionally offensive.” Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n, (quotation o mitted).
In re the Matter of: Victoria Carlson and Stephen Carlson, Appellants, vs. Pam Wheelock, in her official capacity … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n
Dwayne Eugene Jackson, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Both clauses have been analyzed under the same principles and begin with the mandate that all similarly situated individuals shall be treated alike, but only invidious discrimination is deemed constitutiona lly offensive.” Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n, Inc., (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S.E.M., J.M.K., S.M.M. and D.J.S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
The Equal Protection Clauses “mandate that all similarly situated individuals shall be treated alike, but only invidious discrimination is deemed constitutionally offensive.” Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n, d 66, 74 (Minn. 2000) (quotation omitted).
In the MATTER OF the Application for Licensure of Nadeen GRIEPENTROG 888 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the MATTER OF the Application for Licensure of Nadeen GRIEPENTROG 888 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
That provision guarantees that “all similarly situated individuals shall be treated alike.” Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n
Janie "Jane" Astramecki v. Minnesota Department of Agriculture Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Janie "Jane" Astramecki v. Minnesota Department of Agriculture Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Under both clauses, “only ‘invidious discrimination’ is deemed constitutionally offensive.” Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n, (quotation omitted).
In re the Welfare of B.A.H. 845 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 2014
In re the Welfare of B.A.H. 845 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 2014
XIV, § 1; Minn. Const, art. I, § 2; see also Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n, (explaining that Article, Section of the Minnesota Constitution, though phrased differently, has been “analyzed under the same principles” as the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause).
In re Guardianship of Durand 845 N.W.2d 821 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re Guardianship of Durand 845 N.W.2d 821 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n, Inc.
Dean v. City of Winona 843 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Dean v. City of Winona 843 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Lastly, even if appellants did show that the 30% rule resulted in different treatment of similarly situated property owners, they would also have to show that the treatment was not merely different: only “invidious discrimination is deemed constitutionally offensive.” Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n, Inc., (quotation omitted).
Healthstar Home Health, Inc. v. Jesson 827 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Healthstar Home Health, Inc. v. Jesson 827 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n, (noting that one test is the test articulated by federal courts and the other is “often characterized as the Minnesota rational basis test”).
State v. Cox 798 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 2011
Sayer v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 769 N.W.2d 305 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Sayer v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 769 N.W.2d 305 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n
Gluba Ex Rel. Gluba v. Bitzan & Ohren Masonry 735 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 2007
Gluba Ex Rel. Gluba v. Bitzan & Ohren Masonry 735 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 2007
We have stated that “[b]oth clauses have been analyzed under the same principles and begin with the mandate that all similarly situated individuals shall be treated alike, but only ‘invidious discrimination’ is deemed constitutionally offensive.” (quoting Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n, ).
State v. Richmond 730 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Richmond 730 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
The equal protection clauses of both the United States and Minnesota constitutions “mandate that all similarly situated individuals shall be treated alike.” Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n
Granville v. Minneapolis School District 716 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Granville v. Minneapolis School District 716 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Both clauses “mandate *392 that all similarly situated individuals shall be treated alike, but only ‘invidious discrimination’ is deemed constitutionally offensive.” Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n, see U.S. Const, amend.
State v. Barnes 713 N.W.2d 325 Minn. 2006
State v. Barnes 713 N.W.2d 325 Minn. 2006
Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n
Council of Independent Tobacco Manufacturers of America v. State 713 N.W.2d 300 Minn. 2006
MN CITIZENS CONCERNED FOR LIFE v. Kelley 698 N.W.2d 424 Minn. 2005
MN CITIZENS CONCERNED FOR LIFE v. Kelley 698 N.W.2d 424 Minn. 2005
Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass'n, Inc.
In Re the Welfare of T.C.J. 689 N.W.2d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re the Welfare of T.C.J. 689 N.W.2d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
nnesota Constitution provides, “[n]o member of this [s]tate shall be disenfranchised, or deprived of any of the rights or privileges secured to any citizen thereof, unless by the law of the land, or the judgment of his peers.” While all similarly situated persons shall be treated alike, “only invidious discrimination is deemed constitutionally offensive.” Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n, (quotation omitted).
State v. Garcia 683 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 2004
State v. Garcia 683 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 2004
ived of any of the rights or privileges secured to any citizen thereof, unless by the law of the land or the judgment of his peers.” “Both clauses have been analyzed under the same principles and begin with the mandate that all similarly situated individuals shall be treated alike, but only ‘invidious discrimination’ is deemed constitutionally offensive.” Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n
Minnesota Automatic Merchandising Council v. Salomone 682 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 2004
Minnesota Automatic Merchandising Council v. Salomone 682 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 2004
Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n, ().
State v. Benniefield 678 N.W.2d 42 Minn. 2004
State v. Benniefield 678 N.W.2d 42 Minn. 2004
Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n, Inc.
State v. Serena 673 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Serena 673 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Assn., Inc., Behl, d at 568 .
Kammueller v. Kammueller 672 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Kammueller v. Kammueller 672 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n
State v. Benniefield 668 N.W.2d 430 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Benniefield 668 N.W.2d 430 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n
Granville v. Minneapolis Public Schools, Special School District No. 1 668 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Granville v. Minneapolis Public Schools, Special School District No. 1 668 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
mandate that all similarly situated individuals shall be treated alike, but only ‘invidious discrimination’ is deemed constitutionally offensive.” Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass’n