Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Care Institute, Inc.-Roseville v. County of Ramsey, 612 N.W.2d 443.

52 citing documents.

Christopher Villella, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Cities Management, Inc., Relator v. Commissioner of Revenue Minn. 2023
Cities Management, Inc., Relator v. Commissioner of Revenue Minn. 2023
As to this element, we have stated that “[i]n tax cases, the matter in the second suit must be identical in all respects to that in the prior suit, and the controlling facts and legal principles must remain unchanged.” Care Inst.
Khan Turouk, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Jeffrey James Nathe, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Yet the same subject matter alone does not establish that two claims are the same cause of action when “the right to assert the second claim did not arise at the same time as the right to assert the first claim.” Care Institute, Inc. - (emphasis added).
In the Matter of the Administrative Order Issued to Steven A. Hackbarth, individually, and dba Hackbarth Roofing. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Jayson Dock, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
ermination re garding the permitted number of docks differs in form, purpose, and scope from the Prior Litigation” and that “[t]he proof required to determine the issues in this action differs from the proof required in the Prior Litigation.” 7 “Identity of subject matter does not establish that two claims are the same cause of action.” Care Inst., Inc. -Roseville v. C ounty of Ramsey
The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee For The Certificateholders Of CWABS Inc., Asset-backed Certificates, Series 2007-6 … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee For The Certificateholders Of CWABS Inc., Asset-backed Certificates, Series 2007-6 … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Care Inst., (stating elements of collateral estoppel).
Reichel Investments, L.P. v. Craig A. Reichel Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Reichel Investments, L.P. v. Craig A. Reichel Minn. Ct. App. 2016
of Ramsey, d 443, 446 (Minn. 2000).
Brittany Ann Vacko v. Rebecca Lee Treptow Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Brittany Ann Vacko v. Rebecca Lee Treptow Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Rebecca Lee Treptow v. Brittany Ann Layland Vacko Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Rebecca Lee Treptow v. Brittany Ann Layland Vacko Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Estate of: Bernice R. Murray aka Bernice Murray Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Estate of: Bernice R. Murray aka Bernice Murray Minn. Ct. App. 2016
This is significant because we will not hold that claims arise from the same cause of action if “the right to assert the second claim did not arise at the same time as the right to assert the first claim.” Care Inst.
Marjorie Gowan v. The Estate of Robert E. Pape Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Marjorie Gowan v. The Estate of Robert E. Pape Minn. Ct. App. 2016
David J. Mach, Jr. v. Wells Concrete Products Co., and CCMSI, Relators, and Blue Cross Blue Shield, Operating … 866 N.W.2d 921 Minn. 2015
David J. Mach, Jr. v. Wells Concrete Products Co., and CCMSI, Relators, and Blue Cross Blue Shield, Operating … 866 N.W.2d 921 Minn. 2015
James Klapmeier v. Joseph Michael Ebel Minn. Ct. App. 2014
James Klapmeier v. Joseph Michael Ebel Minn. Ct. App. 2014
The supreme court has stated that two “claims cannot be considered the same cause of action if ‘the right to assert the second claim did not arise at the same time as the right to assert the first claim.’” Hauschildt, d at 841 (quoting Care Inst., ).
Living Word Bible Camp v. County of Itasca 829 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 2013
Living Word Bible Camp v. County of Itasca 829 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 2013
of Ramsey, (remanding to the tax court to apply the developments in the law to the county’s motion for summary judgment).
Fain v. Andersen 816 N.W.2d 696 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Fain v. Andersen 816 N.W.2d 696 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Afton Historical Society Press v. County of Washington 742 N.W.2d 434 Minn. 2007
Afton Historical Society Press v. County of Washington 742 N.W.2d 434 Minn. 2007
Referring to Care Institute
Under the Rainbow Child Care Center, Inc. v. County of Goodhue 741 N.W.2d 880 Minn. 2007
Under the Rainbow Child Care Center, Inc. v. County of Goodhue 741 N.W.2d 880 Minn. 2007
We held that the fact that an entity operates at a loss is not sufficient to satisfy the third North Star factor, Community Memorial Home, d at 87 , because revenues may not cover costs for a variety of reasons, “not necessarily because the facility intends to charge a below-cost rent.” Care Inst.
Drewitz v. Motorwerks, Inc. 728 N.W.2d 231 Minn. 2007
Drewitz v. Motorwerks, Inc. 728 N.W.2d 231 Minn. 2007
Care Institute Inc.-Roseville v. County of Ramsey (CIIR)
Croixdale, Inc. v. County of Washington 726 N.W.2d 483 Minn. 2007
Croixdale, Inc. v. County of Washington 726 N.W.2d 483 Minn. 2007
Antone v. Mirviss 720 N.W.2d 331 Minn. 2006
Heine v. Simon 702 N.W.2d 752 Minn. 2005
Heine v. Simon 702 N.W.2d 752 Minn. 2005
Hauschildt v. Beckingham 686 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 2004
Hauschildt v. Beckingham 686 N.W.2d 829 Minn. 2004
Care Inst., , -446 (Minn.2000) (CIIR).
Hauschildt v. Beckingham 668 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Hauschildt v. Beckingham 668 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Arbitration of Olson v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. 659 N.W.2d 283 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Arbitration of Olson v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. 659 N.W.2d 283 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Nelson v. American Family Insurance Group 651 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 2002
Nelson v. American Family Insurance Group 651 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 2002
Care Inst., Inc .— Veline, 64 Minn. at 121 , 66 N.W.
State v. Joseph 636 N.W.2d 322 Minn. 2001
State v. Joseph 636 N.W.2d 322 Minn. 2001
Improvement of County Ditch No. 86, Branch 1 v. Phillips 625 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 2001
Improvement of County Ditch No. 86, Branch 1 v. Phillips 625 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 2001

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by