Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Improvement of County Ditch No. 86, Branch 1 v. Phillips, 625 N.W.2d 813.

25 citing documents.

Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc., et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
MSP Apartments, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
MSP Apartments also contends that the requirement of an injury-in- fact to confer standing “is not a requirement per se,” relying primarily on Phillips v. County of Blue Earth (In re Improvement of County Ditch No. 86)
Orono Oaks Volunteer Road Association, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Ditch No. 86, rev’d on other grounds
A24-1031 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Ditch No. 86), see also Minn. R. Civ.
Deborah Jane Clapp v. Rochelle Cox, in her official capacity as Interim Superintendent of Minneapolis ... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Deborah Jane Clapp v. Rochelle Cox, in her official capacity as Interim Superintendent of Minneapolis ... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Ditch No. 86 v. Phillips, ).
In the Matter of Keystone Township, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
No. 86, Branch 1 v. Phillips
Robert C. Tengdin, Trustee of the Robert C. Tengdin Revocable Trust dated May 18, 2009, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Charles Carlson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
of Blue Earth v. Phillips, 9 rev’d on other grounds
In re the Appeal from the Order of the Joint Board of Kandiyohi and Meeker Counties Acting as … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Andrew Carufel, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Standing is a prerequisite to a court’s exercise of jurisdiction.” Petition for Improvement of County Ditch No. 86 v. Phillips
Sec. Bank & Trust Co. v. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. 916 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 2018
Sec. Bank & Trust Co. v. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. 916 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 2018
Ditch No. 86 , , 817 (Minn. 2001) ("Standing is a prerequisite to a court's exercise of jurisdiction.").
In Re the Estate of Jotham 722 N.W.2d 447 Minn. 2006
In Re the Estate of Jotham 722 N.W.2d 447 Minn. 2006
In re Petition for Improvement of County Ditch, No. 86, Branch 1, , 61 n. 7 (Minn.1980).
Hanson v. Woolston 701 N.W.2d 257 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Hanson v. Woolston 701 N.W.2d 257 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In re Petition for Improvement of County Ditch No. 86
Custody of A.V.A. v. Ratchaneewan 683 N.W.2d 325 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Custody of A.V.A. v. Ratchaneewan 683 N.W.2d 325 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
8(a)(2) (2002)(requiring dismissal of custody petition where petitioners cannot show themselves to be “interested third parties”); In re Improvement of County Ditch No. 86, Branch 1 v. Phillips, (stating standing “is a prerequisite to a court’s exercise of jurisdiction”).
Free Press v. County of Blue Earth 677 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Free Press v. County of Blue Earth 677 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In re Petition for Improvement of County Ditch No. 86
Alliance for Metropolitan Stability v. Metropolitan Council 671 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Alliance for Metropolitan Stability v. Metropolitan Council 671 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In re Improvement of County Ditch No. 86, rev’d on other grounds
Pestka v. County of Blue Earth 654 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Pestka v. County of Blue Earth 654 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In re Improvement of County Ditch No. 86 v. Phillips, (Phillips II).