Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Robb, 622 N.W.2d 564.

24 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Rodger Dean Robb II Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Rodger Dean Robb II Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Joshua Lee Winsky. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“‘An assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by any argument or authorities in appellant’s brief is waived and will not be considered on appeal unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection.’” (quoting Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co. , ), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Randy Lee Morrow. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“[T]he burden of proving that a less-restrictive program is available is on the patient.” rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
In re the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Malcolm Renfro. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
9 -74 (Minn. App. 2001) (ten-year gap between sexual offenses), rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Earl Lionell Ward. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Entitlement to a new trial on the grounds of improper evidentiary rulings rests upon the complaining party’s ability to demonstrate prejudicial error.” rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: James Allen Martin. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Martin does not identify any specific instances of bias and “[a] n assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by legal authority or argument is waived unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection.” rev. denied (Minn. Apr.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Alan Joseph Schiller. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-67 (Minn. App. 2001), review denied (Minn. Apr.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Jose Luis Gutierrez. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-74 (Minn. App. 2001) (noting that the exi stence of a period in which a person has not committed sex offenses does not preclude a determination that he engaged in a course of sexual misconduct) , review denied (Minn. Apr.
Michael McCabe, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(noting that the exclusionary rule is not the proper remedy for violations of section 13.04, subdivision 2, review denied (Minn. Apr.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Tyler Paul Gephart. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“[T]he burden of proving that a less - restrictive program is available is on the patient.” review denied (Minn. Apr.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Jose Garcia Arellano Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See In re Robb , review denied (Minn. Apr.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Jamie Allen Andrews. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Jamie Allen Andrews. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Apr.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Brian Lee Wilbur. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Brian Lee Wilbur. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
This court has held that “the [SDP] statute does not require a showing of violence.” review denied (Minn. Apr.
In Re Civil Commitment of Williams 735 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re Civil Commitment of Williams 735 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
(stating that district court has discretion to admit evidence absent erroneous interpretation of law), review denied (Minn. Apr.
In Re the Civil Commitment of Stone 711 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Civil Commitment of Stone 711 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
-74 (Minn.App.2001), review denied (Minn. Apr.
In Re Kindschy 634 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Kindschy 634 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
nal sex with children as young as four years old supported finding that sex offender had utter lack of power to control his sexual impulses and justified SPP commitment); (holding SPP commitment not justified when inappropriate sexual conduct, although repellent, included only spanking of young boys, fondling, and indecent exposure); (reversing SPP commitment of band teacher where sexual assaults included masturbation and fellatio but involved no physical injuries, and mental harm caused by assa
In Re Preston 629 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Preston 629 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
See, e.g., Rickmyer, d at 190 ; review denied (Minn. Apr.