Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Hoelzel, 639 N.W.2d 605.

61 citing documents.

State v. Thompson 754 N.W.2d 352 Minn. 2008
Thompson also argues that his guilty plea was not “recorded by the court” until the filing and entry of the judgment of conviction, which did not occur until after the sentencing hearing.
State v. Bussmann 741 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 2007
State v. Bussmann 741 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 2007
State v. Lee 706 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 2005
State v. Lee 706 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 2005
We again recognized that stays of adjudication are pretrial orders *494
State v. Lee 693 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Lee 693 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Martinek v. State 678 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Martinek v. State 678 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
(stating that district court’s record conviction and enter judgment in court file); (stating that because of imprecision of transcripts relating to sentencing and conviction orders, “we typically look to the official judgment of conviction, which gene
State v. Mix 646 N.W.2d 247 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Mix 646 N.W.2d 247 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
(court abuses its discretion when it acts arbitrarily and capriciously); (court abuses its discretion if its findings are contrary to the law); (court abuses its discretion if it does not justify se