Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Hoelzel, 639 N.W.2d 605.

61 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Kyle Lloyd Ketterling Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Kyle Lloyd Ketterling Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
d 605, 609 (Minn. 2002).
Mark Scott Hendrickson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
However, “even if the court has such a clear judicial duty, if there is some other plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law, the writ may not issue.” Minn. Stat. § 586.02 (2024).
State of Minnesota v. Toni Elizabeth Ickler Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Toni Elizabeth Ickler Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jorge Alberto Martinez Reyes, Appellant. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A district court typically records a conviction by making a "separate entry in the file," in writing, or, stated slightly differently, by making the conviction "appear in a judgment entered in the file,"
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“While court-ac cepted guilty pleas, jury verdicts of guilt, and findings of guilt by a court are often re ferred to as ‘convictions,’ a formal adjudication of conviction requires more.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
He relies on caselaw that addresses “whether the defendant had been formally convicted of a particular [lesser-included] offense, not when [the] conviction occurred.” Nodes, at 81 ( ).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
findings of guilt by a court are often referred to as ‘convictions,’ a formal adjudication of conviction requires more.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(concluding that verdict of guilt, without recorded judgment of conviction, is not final, appealable judgment).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(concluding that verdict of guilt, without recorded judgment of conviction, is not final, appealable judgment).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“A conviction appearing in the official judgment of conviction or in a conviction order entered 6 by the court has been formally adjudicated.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“A conviction appearing in the official judgment of conviction or in a conviction or der entered by the court has been formally adjudicated.” (quotation omitted).
State v. Walker 913 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Walker 913 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
5 (2016) ; see also State v. Hoelzel , , 609 (Minn. 2002).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
d 605, 609 (Minn. 2002) (concluding that verdic t of guilt, without recorded judgment of conviction, is not final, appealable judgment).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Larsen 901 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Larsen 901 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(stating that the district court’s finding of guilt was not appealable in absence of official judgment of conviction or conviction ordered entered by the court); (declining to address sufficiency challenge for guilty verdict when defendant w
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(instructing courts to include information contained in Minn. R. Crim.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-10 (Minn. 2002) (holding that verdict of guilt, without recorded judgment of conviction, is not final, appealable judgment); (declining to address sufficiency-of-evidence argument with respect to counts on which defendant was found guilty but not formally ad
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-10 (Minn. 2002) (holding that verdict of guilt, without recorded judgment of conviction, is not final, appealable judgment); (declining to address sufficiency -of-evidence argument with respect to counts on which defendant was found guilty but not formally adj
State of Minnesota v. Johnnie Robert Capers Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Enamidem Celestine Okon v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Enamidem Celestine Okon v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Johnnie Robert Capers Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(concluding that the court “need not decide” a sufficiency of the evidence challenge to counts for which no sentence was imposed); (concluding that verdict of guilt, without recorded judgment of conviction, is not final, appealable judgment).
State of Minnesota v. Cheng Pao Vue Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Cheng Pao Vue Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Ashland, d at 650; (holding that verdict of guilt, without recorded judgment of conviction and sentence, is not final, appealable conviction).1 Vue also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction on count III, first-degree burglary with a dangerous weapon.
State of Minnesota v. Gatwech Yiek Thach Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Gatwech Yiek Thach Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(holding that verdict of guilt, without recorded judgment of conviction, is not final, appealable judgment); (declining to address sufficiency-of-evidence argument with respect to counts on which defendant was found guilty but not formally adjudi
State of Minnesota v. Jesus Armando Puente Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Jesus Armando Puente Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(concluding that district court’s finding of guilt was not appealable in absence of official judgment of conviction or conviction order entered by court); (declining to address sufficiency of evidence for jury’s guilty verdict on offenses of whic
State of Minnesota v. Livinus Ndubisi Ezeobi Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Livinus Ndubisi Ezeobi Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(concluding that district court’s finding of guilt was not appealable in absence of official judgment of conviction or conviction order entered by court); (declining to address sufficiency of evidence for jury’s guilty verdict on offenses of whic
State of Minnesota v. Travis Earl Stringer Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Travis Earl Stringer Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(holding that guilty verdict, without 8 recorded judgment of conviction and sentence, is not final, appealable adjudication); (declining to address sufficiency-of- evidence argument for counts on whic
State of Minnesota v. Carl Lee Nodes 863 N.W.2d 77 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Carl Lee Nodes 863 N.W.2d 77 Minn. 2015
As to the requirement that a plea be “recorded” before it is a conviction, Nodes argues, that a plea is not recorded until the district court has prepared and filed a written judgment.
State of Minnesota v. Orlando Delgado Espinosa Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Orlando Delgado Espinosa Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(holding that jury verdict of guilt, without recorded judgment of conviction and sentence, is not final, appealable adjudication); (declining to address sufficiency-of-evidence argument for counts on which defendant was found guilty but not sente
State of Minnesota v. Rebecca Brynetta Passon Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Rebecca Brynetta Passon Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(holding that verdict of guilt, without recorded judgment of conviction, is not final, appealable adjudication); (declining 10 to address sufficiency-of-evidence argument for counts on which defendan
State v. Nodes 849 N.W.2d 85 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Nodes 849 N.W.2d 85 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(“The general practice, and a practice to which district courts should adhere, is to have the conviction recorded and appear in a judgment entered in the file.”).
State v. Jeffries 806 N.W.2d 56 Minn. 2011
State v. Jeffries 806 N.W.2d 56 Minn. 2011
“For accepted pleas, verdicts, or findings of guilt to become convictions under Minnesota law, the conviction must be recorded.” (emphasis added).
State v. Thompson 754 N.W.2d 352 Minn. 2008