Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Riley v. 1987 Station Wagon, Vin: 1JCMT7840HTI07485, 650 N.W.2d 441.

36 citing documents.

Kareem INC v. Property Seized by Minnesota Department of Revenue in Goodhue County, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Kareem INC v. Property Seized by Minnesota Department of Revenue in Goodhue County, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Riley v. 2987 Station Wagon, (citing United States v. One 1936 Model Ford, 307 U.S. 219, 226 (1939)).
Jon Peter Smith, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
1 In a civil-forfeiture action, “[t]he property seized becomes the defendant based on the legal fiction that it is the inanimate object itself, not its possessor or owner, that is guilty of wrongdoing.” Riley v. 1987 Station Wagon
Lucas Paul Gilbertson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Both 1 In a civil forfeiture action, “[t]he property seized becomes the defendant based on the legal fiction that it is the inanimate object itself, not its possessor or owner, that is guilty of wrongdoing.” Riley v. 1987 Station Wagon
Jamey Ryan Williams Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Interpretation of a statute is subject to de novo review , Riley v. 1987 Station Wagon , but a district court’s factual findings “are given great deference, and shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous,” Fletcher v. St.
Troy Kenneth Scheffler, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
If statutory construction is required, we are mindful that forfeiture laws in Minnesota are “remedial in nature and are to be liberally const rued.” Riley v. 1987 Station Wagon
Briles v. 2013 GMC Terrain, MN License No.: 168KSE, VIN: 2GKFLZE3XD6336507 892 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Briles v. 2013 GMC Terrain, MN License No.: 168KSE, VIN: 2GKFLZE3XD6336507 892 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
2801, 2808-10 , 125 L.Ed.2d 488 (1993); Riley v. 1987 Station Wagon
Nielsen v. 2003 Honda Accord 845 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 2013
Woodruff v. 2008 Mercedes 831 N.W.2d 9 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Woodruff v. 2008 Mercedes 831 N.W.2d 9 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Riley v. 1987 Station Wagon
Patino v. One 2007 Chevrolet, Vin 1GNFC16017J255427, Texas License Plate 578VYH 805 N.W.2d 906 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Patino v. One 2007 Chevrolet, Vin 1GNFC16017J255427, Texas License Plate 578VYH 805 N.W.2d 906 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Riley v. 1987 Station Wagon
Peterson v. 2004 Ford Crown Victoria Vin: 2FAHP74WX4X158445 792 N.W.2d 454 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Peterson v. 2004 Ford Crown Victoria Vin: 2FAHP74WX4X158445 792 N.W.2d 454 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
At the same time, the Minnesota Supreme Court has stated that due to the punitive nature of a forfeiture law “we strictly construe its language and resolve any doubt in favor of the party challenging it.” Riley v. 1987 Station Wagon
Laase v. 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe 776 N.W.2d 431 Minn. 2009
Laase v. 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe 776 N.W.2d 431 Minn. 2009
See Riley v. 1987 Station Wagon, (noting that “we strictly construe” the forfeiture law “and resolve any doubt [in its applicability] in favor of the party challenging [the forfeiture]”).
State v. Johnson 775 N.W.2d 377 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Johnson 775 N.W.2d 377 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“The object of all interpretation and construction of laws is to ascertain and effectuate the intention of the legislature.” Riley v.1987 Station Wagon, (quoting Minn.Stat.
Laase v. 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe 755 N.W.2d 23 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Torgelson v. . Real Property Known as 17138 880th Ave., Renville County 749 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 2008
Torgelson v. . Real Property Known as 17138 880th Ave., Renville County 749 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 2008
2801 , 125 L.Ed.2d 488 (1993) (holding that forfeitures of real property pursuant to federal law are fines that fall within the scope of the Excessive Fines Clause of the United States Constitution); Riley v. 1987 Station Wagon, (“[T]o the extent that the forfeiture law at issue here is, in part, ‘punishment’ and, therefore, disfavored generally, we strictly construe its language and resolve any doubt in favor of the party challenging it.”).
Torgelson v. Real Property Known as 17138 880th Ave 734 N.W.2d 279 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Torgelson v. Real Property Known as 17138 880th Ave 734 N.W.2d 279 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
558 (1931) (stating that in an in rem proceeding, “[i]t is the property which is proceeded against, and, by resort to a legal fiction, held guilty and condemned as though it were conscious.”); Riley v. 1987 Station Wagon, (stating that in an in rem forfeiture action “[t]he property seized becomes the defendant based on the legal fiction that it is the inanimate object itself, not its possessor or owner, that is guilty of wrongdoing.”); Aaron Xavier Fellmeth, Challenges and Implications of a Syst
Jacobson v. $55,900 in U.S. Currency 728 N.W.2d 510 Minn. 2007
Jacobson v. $55,900 in U.S. Currency 728 N.W.2d 510 Minn. 2007
Borgen v. 418 Eglon Avenue 712 N.W.2d 809 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Borgen v. 418 Eglon Avenue 712 N.W.2d 809 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
See Riley v. 1987 Station Wagon, VIN:1JCMT7840HTI07485
Miller v. One 2001 Pontiac Aztek 669 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 2003
Miller v. One 2001 Pontiac Aztek 669 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 2003
In Riley v.1987 Station Wagon, the district court ordered the forfeiture of a motor vehicle after the owner was convicted of two counts of conspiracy to commit first-degree murder.
Schug v. Nine Thousand Nine Hundred Sixteen Dollars & Fifty Cents in U.S. Currency 669 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Schug v. $9,916.50 IN US CURRENCY 669 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Schug v. $9,916.50 IN US CURRENCY 669 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Riley v. 1987 Station Wagon, (citing Austin v. United States, 509 U.S. 602, 615-17 , 113 S.Ct.
Schug v. Nine Thousand Nine Hundred Sixteen Dollars & Fifty Cents in U.S. Currency 669 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
The property’s status as defendant is “based on the legal fiction that it is the inanimate object itself, not the possessor or owner, that is guilty of wrongdoing.” Riley v. 1987 Station Wagon, (citing Austin v. United States, 509 U.S. 602, 615-17 , 113 S.Ct.
State v. Stevenson 656 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 2003
State v. Stevenson 656 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 2003
“The object of all interpretation and construction of laws is to ascertain and effectuate the intention of the legislature.” Riley v. 1987 Station Wagon, (quoting Minn.Stat.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by