Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Tomscak v. Tomscak, 352 N.W.2d 464.

68 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A17-1687 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Berger, 308 Minn. at 428, d at 83 7; Wopata v. Wopata , d 478, 485-86 (Minn. App. 1993); Van de Loo v. Van de Loo , -66 (Minn. App. 1984).
In re the Marriage of: Thomas Erle Tornstrom v. Jennifer Lynn Tornstrom, n/k/a Jennifer Lynn Klemenhagen 887 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Thomas Erle Tornstrom v. Jennifer Lynn Tornstrom, n/k/a Jennifer Lynn Klemenhagen 887 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: John Thomas Andrusko v. Genevieve Ann Andrusko Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: John Thomas Andrusko v. Genevieve Ann Andrusko Minn. Ct. App. 2015
superseded in part by statute, 1988 Minn. Laws ch. 668 § 11 (codified at Minn. Stat. § 518.145, subd.
In re the Marriage of: Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld Hare, n/k/a Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld v. Robert Russell Hare Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld Hare, n/k/a Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld v. Robert Russell Hare Minn. Ct. App. 2014
superseded on other grounds by Minn. Stat. § 518.145 (2012).
Ramsey County v. Suggs 653 N.W.2d 458 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Ramsey County v. Suggs 653 N.W.2d 458 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
See, (stipulated divorce decrees are favored); (noting that stipulations are favored).
Marriage of Clark v. Clark 642 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Marriage of Clark v. Clark 642 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
The district court denied mother’s and denied her supplemental motion as untimely.
Marriage of Prahl v. Prahl 627 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Prahl v. Prahl 627 N.W.2d 698 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
-86 (Minn.App.1993) (upholding reservation of maintenance where husband was, at dissolution, financially self-sufficient but heart problems made future self-sufficiency uncertain); (requiring district court to amend decree to include reservation of jurisdiction on maintenance issue where spouse’s cancer could recur and make maintenance necessary).
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 621 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 621 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
First, for the proposition that “courts can set aside a stipulation upon a showing of fraud, duress, or mistake.” Second, for the proposition that a court “may exclude a stipulation where there has not been a full disc
Marriage of Toughill v. Toughill 609 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Marriage of Toughill v. Toughill 609 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
(noting, historically, a party could be relieved of dissolution judgment for fraud, duress, or mistake); (stating that district courts may set aside stipulation-based dissolution judgments for fraud, duress, or mistake).
Marriage of Hestekin v. Hestekin 587 N.W.2d 308 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Marriage of Hestekin v. Hestekin 587 N.W.2d 308 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Marriage of Shirk v. Shirk 561 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 1997
Marriage of Shirk v. Shirk 561 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 1997
Shirk v. Shirk 551 N.W.2d 504 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Shirk v. Shirk 551 N.W.2d 504 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Emerick on Behalf of Howley v. Sanchez 547 N.W.2d 109 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Emerick on Behalf of Howley v. Sanchez 547 N.W.2d 109 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Marriage of Sanborn v. Sanborn 503 N.W.2d 499 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marriage of Sanborn v. Sanborn 503 N.W.2d 499 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(courts favor stipulations as a means of expediting dissolution litigation).
Marriage of Geiger v. Geiger 470 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Marriage of Geiger v. Geiger 470 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Cadle v. Cadle 457 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Cadle v. Cadle 457 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
(citing Anderson v. Anderson, 303 Minn. 26 , ).
Marriage of Maranda v. Maranda 449 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 1989
Marriage of Maranda v. Maranda 449 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 1989
(citing Anderson v. Anderson, 303 Minn. 26 , ).
Marriage of Glorvigen v. Glorvigen 438 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Glorvigen v. Glorvigen 438 N.W.2d 692 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Maranda v. Maranda 435 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Maranda v. Maranda 435 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
(citing Anderson v. Anderson, 303 Minn. 26 , ).
In Re the Marriage of Steffan 423 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In Re the Marriage of Steffan 423 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In re Schwarze 417 N.W.2d 744 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In re Schwarze 417 N.W.2d 744 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Ryan v. Ryan, 292 Minn. 52
Marriage of Angier v. Angier 415 N.W.2d 53 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Angier v. Angier 415 N.W.2d 53 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Merickel v. Merickel 414 N.W.2d 208 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Merickel v. Merickel 414 N.W.2d 208 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Blattner v. Blattner 411 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Blattner v. Blattner 411 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Yeager v. Yeager 405 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Yeager v. Yeager 405 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 1987